\begin{table}%t \par \caption {\label{tab:psfit_line}Best-fit parameters from the fits to the spectra of Elias~29, during 6~different time intervals (PN data only), using an absorbed 1T thermal model with an additional line at 6.4~keV (Fe fluorescent line).} \par %\centerline { \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc} \hline\hline\\[-3mm] Time interval & $N({\rm H})$ & $kT$ & $Z$ & $E\!M$ & $f_{\rm 6.4 keV}$ & $W_{\rm 6.4~keV}$ & $\chi^2$/d.o.f. & $P$ & $F_{\rm X}$ & $R_{\rm 6.4~ keV}$\ddag \\ \hline ~ & $N_{22}$ & keV & $Z_{\odot}$ & $E\!M_{53}$ & $f_{-6}$ & eV & ~ & ~ & $F_{-13}$ & \% \\ \hline seg1 & 5.5 $\pm$ 0.7 & 4.8 $\pm$ 1.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.3 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & 34.8 & 1.0 & 0.5 & 1.8 & 46\\ flare & 9.4 $\pm$ 2.0 & 3.9 $\pm$ 1.4 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.3 & 4.5 $\pm$ 3.4 & 2.0 $\pm$ 5.9 & 162.0 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 7.5 & 22\\ seg2 & 8.2 $\pm$ 1.3 & 2.8 $\pm$ 0.6 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & 834.0 & 1.3 & 0.1 & 1.1 & 0.1\\ seg3 & 6.6 $\pm$ 0.8 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.4 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 270.0 & 0.9 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 4.0\\ seg4 & 7.6 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.6 $\pm$ 0.4 & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.7 & 171.0 & 1.3 & 0.1 & 2.7 & 3.1 \\ seg5 & 4.9 $\pm$ 0.4 & 4.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.8 & 335.0 & 1.2 & 0.2 & 2.5 & 0.3\\ \hline seg3$+$seg4$+$seg5$\diamondsuit$ & 6.4 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.9 $\pm$ 0.3 & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.3 & 330.0 & 1.3 & 0.0 & 2.1 & 0.0\\ \hline \end{tabular}} \par \smallskip \par \ddag\ Probability that a line with a best-fit value equal or greater than $W_{\rm 6.4~keV}$ could be due to a random fluctuation in the data, as estimated via Monte Carlo simulations (see Sects.~3 and~4). \par $\diamondsuit$ Results for the fit to the source's spectrum integrated over time intervals ``seg3'', ``seg4'', and ``seg5''. \par Note: For the line, the total flux in the line ($f_{\rm 6.4 ~keV}$ in units of $f_{-6} = 10^{-6}$~photons~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$) and the equivalent width ($W_{\rm 6.4~keV}$) are given. \par \end{table}