\begin{table}%t1
\par
\caption{\label{fit}Best fit parameters for the baseline model, for $E>4$ keV. 
}
%\centerline
 {\begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
\hline\hline
 & $\Gamma$ & $N_{\rm H}$  &  $R$ & $E_{\rm line}$ & $F_{\rm line}$ & {\it EW} & $\chi^2_r$/d.o.f. & Flux (XIS0; 4--10 keV)  \\
 &  & (10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$) & & (keV) & 10$^{-5}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ & (eV) &  
& 10$^{-12}$  erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \\
\hline
Total & $1.87\pm0.18$  &  $\rm 3.30^{+0.22}_{-0.23}$ & $\rm 2.0^{+1.7}_{-0.9}$ & 
$6.398\pm0.009$ & $\rm 4.34^{+0.55}_{-0.53}$ & $206\pm 26$ & 0.91/150 & 4.26 \\
& & & &  & & & & \\ 
Low & $1.90\pm0.33$  &  $\rm 3.23^{+0.51}_{-0.66}$ & $\rm 3.0^{+9.8}_{-2.1}$ & 
$\rm 6.389^{+0.018}_{-0.024}$ & $\rm 3.90^{+0.91}_{-0.86}$ &  $228\pm 53$ & 1.00/62 & 3.53 \\
& & & &  & & & & \\ 
High & $1.87 \pm0.22$  &  $\rm 3.26^{+0.29}_{-0.28}$ & $\rm 1.6^{+1.9}_{-0.9}$ & 
$\rm 6.404^{+0.010}_{-0.015}$ & $\rm 4.65^{+0.76}_{-0.72}$ & $200\pm 33$ & 0.99/111 & 4.77 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\par
\smallskip
\par
Note: from left to right: the index of the
power-law ($\Gamma$); the column density of the intrinsic absorber; the relative normalization
of the Compton reflection component, $R$; the centroid energy, $E_{\rm line}$, flux, $F_{\rm line}$, and
equivalent width ({\it EW}) of the iron line; the reduced $\chi^2$ and the d.o.f.
\end{table}