\begin{table}%t5
\caption{\label{xraytab}X-ray and radio properties of counterparts of the candidates. }
%%\centerline
%{
\small\begin{tabular}{l c cc cc cc cc}
\hline
\hline\\[-3mm] 
\multicolumn{10}{c}{LAE candidates} \\[2mm]
LAE\_& ${\rm \it S}_{0.5-2.0}$ & ${\rm \it S}_{2.0-4.5}$ & ${\rm \it S}_{4.5-10.0}$  & {\it HR1} & {\it HR2} & $\log(L_{0.5-2.0})$ & Offset & ${\rm \it S}_{1.4~{\rm GHz}}$ & Offset  \\
COSMOS\_\# & & & & & & & (X-ray) & & (Radio)  
\\
\hline\\[-3mm] 
25  & $129.0\pm1.87$ &  $191.0\pm5.63$    & $133.0\pm7.03$ & $0.19\pm0.01$ & $-0.18\pm0.03$ & $45.67\pm0.02$ & 11.06 & --- & ---  \\%C14
36 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & $140\pm27$ & 0.10  \\%C21 
57  & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & $47\pm10$ & 6.17  \\ %L27
82 & $1.25\pm1.97$ & --- & --- & ${<}0.52$ & --- &  $43.66\pm0.41$ & 1.07 & --- & ---  \\%C41
101 & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & $137\pm27$ & 0.06  \\ %C46
113 & $1.21\pm4.10$ & $9.58\pm29.1$ & --- & $0.78\pm0.61$ & ${<}0.01$ &  $43.64\pm0.64$ & 10.55 & --- & ---  \\%C48
115  &  $7.20\pm6.00$     &  $16.2\pm21.5$ &               ---         & $0.38\pm0.59$ & ${<}{-}0.25$ & $44.42\pm0.78$ & 0.17 & --- & ---  \\ %C49
119 & $0.92\pm0.26$ & --- & --- & ${<}0.63$ & --- & $43.55\pm0.14$ & 2.67 & --- & ---  \\ %L70
121  &  $17.6\pm0.73$ & $31.0\pm2.54$ & $18.3\pm3.52$ & $0.28\pm0.04$  & $-0.26\pm0.11$ & $44.81\pm0.03$ & 6.36 & --- & ---  \\ %L71
129 & $1.10\pm0.27$ & --- & --- & ${<}0.57$ & --- & $43.60\pm0.12$ & 1.95 & --- & ---  \\ %L77
132  & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & $47\pm10$ & 9.83  \\ %L80
140  &  $17.5\pm0.72$ & $46.3\pm2.97$ & $44.9\pm4.73$ & $0.45\pm0.03$ & $-0.02\pm0.06$ & $44.80\pm0.02$ & 0.74 & --- & ---  \\ %C54
150  &  $2.6\pm0.30$   & $8.3\pm1.48$    &     ---                    & $0.52\pm0.07$ & ${<}0.08$ & $43.98\pm0.05$ & 0.62 & $107\pm30$ & 0.21   \\ %L95
161 & $2.42\pm0.33$ & --- & --- & ${<}0.25$ & --- & $43.95\pm0.06$ & 0.21 & --- & ---  \\%C58
\hline\\[-2mm]
\multicolumn{10}{c}{GALEX-detected candidates} \\[2mm]
%\hline
42  & $4.9\pm2.92$ &          ---                & --- &      ${<}-0.10$                   & --- & $40.6\pm0.39$ & 0.55 &  --- & ---  \\%C24
108  & $8.3\pm0.60$ & $16.9\pm2.14$  & --- & $0.34\pm0.06$ & ${<}{-}0.27$ & $40.83\pm0.03$ & 1.01 & --- & ---  \\%C47
126  & $7.9\pm0.50$ &  $12.0\pm1.79$ & --- & $0.38\pm0.59$ & ${<}{-}0.11$ & $40.81\pm0.03$ & 0.45 & --- & ---  \\%C52
155  & $3.0\pm0.34$ &  $5.6\pm1.21$    & --- & $0.30\pm0.10$ & ${<}0.27$ & $40.39\pm0.06$ & 1.57 & --- & ---  \\%C56
173  & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & --- & $110\pm25$ & 9.44  \\%C62 
\hline
\end{tabular}%}
\medskip
\par
Data from the catalogues of Cappelluti et~al. (\cite{Cappelluti2007}) and Schinnerer et~al. (\cite{Shinnerer2007}). X-ray fluxes are given in units of $10^{-15}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$ and radio fluxes in units of $\mu$Jy. \emph{HR1} and \emph{HR2} correspond to the hardness ratios defined in Eqs.~(\ref{hr1}) and~(\ref{hr2}). The X-ray luminosity is in erg~s$^{-1}$, assuming the objects are located at redshifts $z = 2.25$~and~$0.06$ for LAE and GALEX-detected candidates respectively. Offsets are distance from centroid of narrow-band detection to X-ray/radio detection in units of arcseconds. It is expected that the objects with offsets larger than a few arcseconds (25, 57, 113, 121, 132 and 173) are unrelated to the candidates due to the large offset and the relatively large probability of random association. 
\end{table}