\begin{table}%t3
%\centering
\par
\caption{\label{table2}Same as Table \ref{table1}, but  for  the best-fit  model for 
         PG 1707+427  ($M_*=0.542~M_{\odot}$, $T_{\rm  eff}= 89~504$~K,  $\log(L_*/L_{\odot})= 1.40$).   The  observed periods  are
         taken from Kawaler et~al. (\cite{Kawaler04}).}
\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
\hline
\hline\\[-3.2mm]
$\Pi_i^{\rm O}$ & $\Pi_k^{\rm T}$ & $k$ & $\dot{\Pi}^{\rm T}_k$ & 
Unstable\\[-3.2mm]\\
\hline
$ 334.62 $ & $ 333.26 $ & 12 & $2.13 $ &  yes     \\
  ---      & $ 355.73 $ & 13 & $1.19 $ &  yes     \\  
  ---      & $ 378.53 $ & 14 & $2.17 $ &  yes     \\  
  ---      & $ 401.64 $ & 15 & $1.51 $ &  yes     \\  
  ---      & $ 423.68 $ & 16 & $1.84 $ &  yes     \\  
$ 448.07 $ & $ 447.31 $ & 17 & $2.46 $ &  yes     \\
  ---      & $ 469.26 $ & 18 & $1.49 $ &  yes     \\  
$ 494.39 $ & $ 492.56 $ & 19 & $2.76 $ &  yes     \\
  ---      & $ 516.50 $ & 20 & $2.61 $ &  yes     \\  
$ 536.41 $ & $ 537.67 $ & 21 & $1.66 $ &  yes     \\
  ---      & $ 562.32 $ & 22 & $3.30 $ &  yes     \\  
  ---      & $ 584.78 $ & 23 & $2.37 $ &  yes     \\  
  ---      & $ 606.62 $ & 24 & $2.73 $ &  yes     \\  
  ---      & $ 632.11 $ & 25 & $3.25 $ &  yes     \\  
  ---      & $ 653.15 $ & 26 & $2.99 $ &  yes     \\  
$ 677.89 $ & $ 677.38 $ & 27 & $3.43 $ &  yes     \\
  ---      & $ 701.20 $ & 28 & $3.03 $ &  yes     \\  
$ 726.02 $ & $ 722.82 $ & 29 & $3.95 $ &  no      \\
$ 745.78 $ & $ 747.58 $ & 30 & $3.42 $ &  no      \\
  ---      & $ 770.93 $ & 31 & $3.71 $ &  no      \\  
  ---      & $ 793.13 $ & 32 & $4.45 $ &  no      \\  
  ---      & $ 817.86 $ & 33 & $3.61 $ &  no      \\  
  ---      & $ 841.70 $ & 34 & $4.64 $ &  no      \\  
  ---      & $ 863.34 $ & 35 & $3.91 $ &  no      \\  
  ---      & $ 888.59 $ & 36 & $5.03 $ &  no      \\  
$ 909.05 $ & $ 912.34 $ & 37 & $4.21 $ &  no      \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}