\begin{table}%t1 \caption{\label{tab:ews}Comparison$^{a}$ of equivalent widths measured by Bensby, Johnson and Cohen.} \par \small%\centerline { \begin{tabular}{l|rrrlll|rrl|rrl|rrl} \hline\hline & \multicolumn{6}{c|}{OGLE-2008-BLG-209S} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{MOA-2006-BLG-099S} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{OGLE-2006-BLG-265S} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{OGLE-2007-BLG-349S} \\ & Ben & John & Coh & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Ben-John} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Ben-Coh} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{John-Coh} & Ben & John & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Ben-John} & Ben & John & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Ben-John} & Ben & Coh & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Ben-Coh} \\ & $N$ & $N$ & $N$ & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\% $\pm\sigma$ ($N$) } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\% $\pm\sigma$ ($N$) } & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\% $\pm\sigma$ ($N$) } & $N$ & $N$ & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\% $\pm\sigma$ ($N$) } & $N$ & $N$ & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\% $\pm\sigma$ ($N$) } & $N$ & $N$ & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\% $\pm\sigma$ ($N$) } \\ \hline Total & 284 & 146 & 109 & $+2\pm9$ (135) & $+5\pm11$ (55) & $+3\pm8$ (32) & 251 &105 & $-4\pm14$ (76) & 188 & 219 & $-2\pm8$ (172) & 181 & 249 & $-1\pm5$ (117)\\ \ion{Fe}{i} & 145 & 72 & 101 & $-1\pm10$ (61) & $+4\pm11$ (49) & $+3\pm8$ (31) & 122 & 35 & $-5\pm11$ (19) & 91 & 98 & $-2\pm8$ (79) & 91 & 135 & $-0\pm3$ (59) \\ \ion{Fe}{ii} & 19 & 2 & 8 & $+4\pm8$ (2) & $+12\pm12$ (6) & $+9\pm0$ (1) & 14 & 4 & $-3\pm9$ (3) & 21 & 9 & $-3\pm14$ (8) & 14 & 11 & $-2\pm8$ (11) \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \medskip $^{a}$ For each element we give the total number of lines that each of the different linelists contain, the average differences (in~percent), the 1-sigma spreads, and the number of lines in common (in~parentheses). \end{table}