\begin{table}%t2 \caption{\label{table:ZL_estimates}The estimated zodiacal light emission.} \par \small%\centerline { \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr} \hline \hline Field & $T_{\rm ZL}$ & $I$(25) & $I$(90) & $I$(150) & $I$(180) & rms \\ & (K) & \multicolumn{4}{c}{(MJy/sr)} & error \\ \hline EBL22 & 280 & 40.51 & 7.69 & 3.03 & 2.19 & 13\% \\ EBL26\_ZL1 & 270 & 106.05 & 21.03 & 8.34 & 6.02 & 21\% \\ EBL26\_ZL2 & 270 & 100.50 & 19.84 & 7.87 & 5.68 & 7\% \\ EBL26 (aver.) & 270 & 100.98 & 19.94 & 7.91 & 5.71 & 14\% \\ NGP\_ZL1 & 260 & 28.65 & 5.95 & 2.38 & 1.72 & 5\% \\ NGP\_ZL2 & 260 & 29.15 & 6.06 & 2.42 & 1.75 & 18\% \\ NGP (aver.) & 260 & 28.69 & 5.96 & 2.38 & 1.72 & 12\% \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \medskip The columns are: (1) name of the EBL field (see Appendix, Table~\ref{table:ZL_observations}); (2)~temperature of the zodiacal light spectrum (Leinert et~al. \cite{Leinert2002}); (3)$-$(6)~estimated intensity of the zodiacal light at 25~$\mu$m, 90~$\mu$m, 150~$\mu$m, and 180~$\mu$m; and (7)~relative uncertainty of the ZL~value calculated on the basis of the difference of the fitted ZL~model and the observations in the range 7.3$-$90~$\mu$m. The zodiacal light estimates are given at the nominal wavelengths assuming a spectrum $\nu I_{\nu}$~= const. For EBL26 and NGP, two separate positions were observed (see Fig.~\ref{fig:allsky} and Table~\ref{table:ZL_observations}). \end{table}