\begin{table}%tC.1 \caption{\label{table:uncertainties}Assessment of the calibration uncertainty for the ISOPHOT~maps. Columns are (1)~name of the field; (2)~wavelength; (3)~average surface brightness of the map; (4)~difference between calibration measurements performed before and after each map; (5)~difference between actual dark current measurements and default dark current values; (6)~difference between the independently calibrated absolute photometry measurements and raster maps; and (7)~difference between partially overlapping maps. These uncertainties have been converted to correspond to the uncertainties at zero hydrogen column density using the fit parameters listed in~Table~\ref{table:fit}.} \par \small%\centerline { \begin{tabular}{lrccccc} \hline \hline Field & $\lambda$ & $\langle S \rangle$ & $\Delta$(FCS) & $\Delta$(DC) & $\Delta$(Abs.) & $\Delta$(Join) \\ & ($\mu$m) & MJy~sr$^{-1}$ & MJy~sr$^{-1}$ & MJy~sr$^{-1}$ & MJy~sr$^{-1}$ & MJy~sr$^{-1}$ \\ \hline EBL22 & 90 & 9.0 & 0.12 & 0.43 & --1.15 & -- \\ EBL22 & 150 & 5.7 & --0.06 & 1.44 & --0.64 & -- \\ EBL22 & 180 & 4.5 & --0.38 & 0.48 & --0.28 & -- \\ EBL22$^1$ & 90 & 6.5 & --1.09 & 0.22 & -- & --0.17 \\ EBL22$^1$ & 150 & 3.6 & 0.02 & 0.30 & -- & 0.07 \\ EBL22$^1$ & 180 & 4.5 & 0.04 & 1.00 & -- & --0.50 \\ EBL26 & 90 & 20.6 & --0.09 & --0.80 & --1.66 & -- \\ EBL26 & 150 & 4.3 & --0.05 & --0.28 & --0.09 & -- \\ EBL26 & 180 & 3.7 & 0.06 & --0.20 & 0.11 & -- \\ NGP(N) & 90 & 7.8 & 0.49 & --0.19 & --0.50 & 0.58 \\ NGP(N) & 150 & 5.1 & 0.06 & --0.30 & --0.35 & 0.19 \\ NGP(N) & 180 & 4.8 & 0.22 & --0.22 & --0.26 & 0.39 \\ NGP(S) & 90 & 6.9 & --0.32 & 0.26 & -- & --0.49 \\ NGP(S) & 150 & 4.7 & 0.04 & --0.30 & -- & --0.18 \\ NGP(S) & 180 & 4.7 & 0.05 & --0.31 & -- & --0.31 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \medskip $^1$ The narrow strip map. \end{table}