\begin{table}%tE.1 \caption{\label{table:comparison}Comparison of existing CIRB estimates in the FIR range. The error estimates quoted by the authors are shown in parenthesis. In our case, we include only the statistical uncertainty.} \small%\centerline { \begin{tabular}{rcll} \hline \hline $\lambda$ & $I_{\nu}$ & Reference & Instrument \\ ($\mu$m) & (MJy~sr$^{-1}$) & & \\ \hline 90 & $<$2.3 & this paper & ISO/ISOPHOT \\ 150/180 & 1.08 (0.32)$^2$ & this paper & ISO/ISOPHOT \\ 100 & $<$$1.1^1$ & Hauser et~al. \cite{Hauser1998} & COBE/DIRBE \\ & 0.73 (0.20)$^1$ & & \\ 100 & 0.37 (0.10) & Dwek et~al. 1998 & COBE/DIRBE \\ 100 & 0.78 (0.20) & Lagache et~al. \cite{Lagache2000} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 100 & 0.83 (0.27) & Finkbeiner et~al. \cite{Finkbeiner2000} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 140 & 1.49 (0.33) & Schlegel et~al. \cite{schlegel} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 140 & 1.17 (0.33) & Hauser et~al. \cite{Hauser1998} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 140 & 0.70 (0.28) & Hauser et~al. \cite{Hauser1998} & COBE/FIRAS \\ 140 & 0.70 (0.28) & Lagache et~al. \cite{Lagache1999} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 140 & 1.12 (0.56) & Lagache et~al. \cite{Lagache2000} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 140 & 1.17 (0.37) & Odegard et~al. \cite{Odegard2007} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 240 & 1.36 (0.16) & Schlegel et~al. \cite{schlegel} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 240 & 1.12 (0.24) & Hauser et~al. \cite{Hauser1998} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 240 & 1.04 (0.16) & Hauser et~al. \cite{Hauser1998} & COBE/FIRAS \\ 240 & 0.88 (0.16) & Lagache et~al. \cite{Lagache1999} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 240 & 0.88 (0.56) & Lagache et~al. \cite{Lagache2000} & COBE/DIRBE \\ 240 & 1.04 (0.24) & Odegard et~al. \cite{Odegard2007} & COBE/DIRBE \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \medskip $^1$ Hauser et~al. did not claim detection at 100~$\mu$m, because the CIRB~signal failed test for isotropy; $^2$~only the statistical error is quoted. \end{table}