\begin{table}%t5
\caption{\label{tab:f1variationresults}Statistical comparison of synthetic populations calculated with different type I migration efficiency factors $\f1$.} 
%%\centerline

 {\begin{tabular}{llllll}
\hline\hline
Feature & $\f1=$ 0.001 & 0.01 & 0.1 & 1.0 &Obs. \\
\hline
Detection probability w/o $\nhot$ ($P$) [\%] & 8.7 & 9.4 & 8.8 & 3.1 & $\sim$5--10\\ 
Detection probability w. $\nhot$ ($\pwhot$) [\%] & 10.7 & 14.0 & 28.7 & 48.0 & $\geq$$7.3\pm1.5$ \\ 
Fraction of cases migrating to $\atouch$ $(\nhot/\ninit)$ [\%] & 2.0 & 4.7 & 19.9 &  45.0 & -- \\
Significance~KS  $a-\msini$ ($\sam$)   [\%] & 87.7 & 35.2 & 7.8 & 0.3 & --\\
Significance~KS $\msini$ ($\sm$) [\%] &  95.6 & 93.6 & 57.3 & 5.0 &--\\
Significance KS $a$  ($\sa$) [\%] & 63.9 & 18.4 &6.7 & 0.2 &--\\
Significance KS [Fe/H] ($\sfeh$) [\%] & 21.7  & 40.8 & 28.0 & 10.0&--\\
%\hline
Detect. prob. with FV05 bias excluding ``Hot'' planets ($\pfv$) [\%] & 4.8 & 5.3 & 5.5 & 2.2&$4.5\pm0.7$\\
Detect. prob. with FV05 bias including ``Hot'' planets ($\pfvwhot$) [\%] &5.2--5.4 &6.0--6.3 & 7.5--8.4 & 4.1--5.5&$\geq$$5.5\pm0.8$\\
Fract. of ``Hot'' detectable planets of all FV05 detectable planets($\ffv$)  [\%] & 7.1--10.7 &  11.4--16.4 & 26.4--34.8 & 47.1--60.5&$\geq$$19\pm6$\\ 
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
All other parameters are kept constant, except that for the $\f1=1.0$ the seed mass is 0.1~instead of 0.6~$\mearth$. The quantities  are the same as in Table~\ref{tab:basicresutls} and~\ref{tab:hotjupresults}.  Where possible, observational constraints are also given (Naef et~al. \cite{naefetal2005}; FV05).
\end{table}