\begin{table}%t1
\caption{\label{PCtable}Best fit spectral parameters for the persistent, the shallow-dipping, and the deep-dipping spectra fit simultaneously with the partial covering model.}
\newcommand{\T}{\rule{0pt}{2.6ex}}
\newcommand{\B}{\rule[-1.2ex]{0pt}{0pt}}
%\begin{center}
{
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c}
\hline
\hline
\multicolumn{2}{l}{{Parameter}} \T \B & {Per. emission} & & {Shallow dip} & & {Deep dip} \\
\hline
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$N_{\rm H}^{\rm fore} ~(10^{22}$~cm$^{-2})$} \T & & & $0.385 \pm 0.007$ & & \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Photon index} \T & & & $1.91 \pm 0.02$ & & \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Norm.~ \T (photons~keV$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$)} & & & $0.0117 \pm 0.0002$ & & \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$N_{\rm H}^{\rm pow}~(10^{22}$~cm$^{-2})$} \T & 0.0 Fixed & & $\rm 77_{-38}^{+67}$ & & $14 \pm 2$ \\
\multicolumn{2}{r}{Significance} \T \B & & & & $2.7$$\sigma$ & \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$f$} \T \B & 0.0 Fixed & & $0.26 \pm 0.01$ & & $0.776 \pm 0.009$ \\
\multicolumn{2}{r}{Significance} \T \B & & & & $>$10$\sigma$ & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{c}{Reduced $\chi^{2} = 1.55$ for 767 d.o.f.} \T \B \\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
%\end{center}
\par
\begin{list}{}{}
\item[Note:]The foreground hydrogen column density, $N_{\rm H}^{\rm fore}$, the photon index and the normalization of the power law are linked between persistent, shallow and deep-dipping emission. The covering fraction $f$ and the hydrogen column density, $N_{\rm H}^{\rm pow}$, are allowed to vary to explain the spectral changes in the spectra. Uncertainties are given at a 90\% confidence level. We also indicate the significance of the change of $N_{\rm H}^{\rm pow}$ and $f$ between shallow and deep-dipping spectra.
\end{list} 
\end{table}