\begin{table}%t3 \caption{Masses of HR~8799 b / c / d from luminosity (and absolute $K$-band magnitude) using various evolutionary models.} \label{tab_masses_from_models} %%\centering \par \begin{tabular}{l|ccccccccc} \hline\hline HR~8799 b & \multicolumn{9}{c}{Luminosity $\log{L/L_{\odot}}= -5.1~\pm~0.1$ \citep{marois-et-al-2008}} \\ \hline Model & \multicolumn{9}{c}{Mass [{\it M}$_{{\rm Jup}}$] at age}\\ & 20 Myr & 30 Myr & 60 Myr & 100 Myr & 160 Myr & 590 Myr & 730 Myr & 1000 Myr & 1128 Myr \\ \hline \citet{burrows-et-al-1997} & 3.5--4.5 & 4.5--6 & 7--8.5 & 9--11 & 11.5--12.5 & 22--26 & 25--30 & 28--33 & 30--36\\ \citet{marley-et-al-2007}$^a$ & 3--5 & 4--7 & 6--10 & & & & & &\\ \citet{chabrier-et-al-2000} & & & & & & 21--26 & & 30--35 &\\ \citet{baraffe-et-al-2003} & & 4--5 & 6--7 & 9--10 & & 21--26 & & 30--35 &\\ \citet{baraffe-et-al-2008}$^b$ & & & $\sim$7 & $\sim$9 & & & & &\\ \hline \citet{baraffe-et-al-2003}$^c$ & & $\sim$5.5 & $\sim$8.5 & $\sim$10.5 & & $\sim$30 & & $\sim$38 &\\ \hline HR~8799 c / d & \multicolumn{9}{c}{Luminosity $\log{L/L_{\odot}}= -4.7~\pm~0.1$ \citep{marois-et-al-2008}} \\ \hline Model & \multicolumn{9}{c}{Mass [{\it M}$_{{\rm Jup}}$] at age}\\ & 20 Myr & 30 Myr & 60 Myr & 100 Myr & 160 Myr & 590 Myr & 730 Myr & 1000 Myr & 1128 Myr \\ \hline \citet{burrows-et-al-1997} & 6--7.5 & 7.5--9.5 & 11--12 & 12.5--13 & 13--13.5 & 30--38 & 35--43 & 40--48 & 41--50\\ \citet{marley-et-al-2007}$^a$ & 6--8 & 8--10 & & & & & & &\\ \citet{chabrier-et-al-2000} & & 6--7 & 8--10 & 10--11 & & 28--34 & & 39--46 &\\ \citet{baraffe-et-al-2003} & & 6--7 & 8--10 & 10--11 & & 27--31 & & 37--43 &\\ \citet{baraffe-et-al-2008}$^b$ & & & $\sim$9 & & & & & &\\ \hline \citet{baraffe-et-al-2003}$^d$ & & $\sim$7.5 & $\sim$10.5 & $\sim$11.5 & & $\sim$38 & & $\sim$48 &\\ \hline \end{tabular} \begin{flushleft} Remarks: All mass values were shortened to appropriate decimals and partly rounded to halves or integers of a Jupiter mass. $^{a}$ Hot-start models. \\$^{b}$ Non irradiated models. $^{c}$ Using $M_{K{\rm s}}$ = 14.05~~$\pm$~~0.08 mag \citep{marois-et-al-2008}. $^{d}$ Using $M_{K{\rm s}}\sim$~13.12 mag instead of slightly different values $M_{K{\rm s}}$ = 13.13~~$\pm$~~0.08 mag for HR~8799~c and $M_{K{\rm s}}$ = 13.11~$\pm$~0.12 mag for HR~8799~d, given in \citet{marois-et-al-2008}. \end{flushleft} \end{table}