\begin{table}%t6
%\begin{minipage}[t]{\textwidth}
\caption{\label{tab_Xother}X-ray spectral analysis of the INS candidates (excluding \candzsf).}
%\centering
\par
%\renewcommand{\footnoterule}{}
\begin{tabular}{l l c c c c r c c c r c} 
\hline\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
Candidate & OBSID & $t_{\rm exp}$$^a$ & d.o.f. & $kT$ & $f_{\rm X,14}$$^b$ & $C$ & Goodness$^c$ & $\Gamma$ & $f_{\rm X,14}$ & $C$ & Goodness \\
 & & (ks) &  & (eV) & (erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$) & & (\%) & & (erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$) & & (\%)\\
\hline
\candosf\  & 204710101 & 2.1  & 22 & $\rm 253^{+53}_{-40}$  & $\rm 3.6^{+0.8}_{-0.7}$    & 14 & 4.6  & 2.0(4) & $\rm 4.6^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$ & 17 & 9.9\\
\candtoe\  & 150870201 & 1.7  & 5  & $\rm 247^{+116}_{-60}$ & $\rm 2.6^{+0.9}_{-0.7}$    & 5  & 18.4 & 1.5(8) & $\rm 4.6^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ & 5 & 19.8\\
\candtfoe\ & 307001301 & 7.3  & 24 & $\rm 200^{+29}_{-24}$  & $\rm 2.00^{+0.3}_{-0.29}$  & 22 & 26.8 & 2.4(4) & $2.8(4)$ & 21 & 22.7\\
\candtfie\ & 201750901 & 11.6 & 17 & $\rm 229^{+58}_{-44}$  & $1.7(3)$               & 24 & 76.7 & 2.1(4) & $2.5(5)$ & 21 & 60.0\\
\candtsf\  & 008830101 & 10.5 & 15 & $\rm 144^{+14}_{-12}$  & $\rm 2.00^{+0.22}_{-0.24}$ & 17 & 58.5 & $\rm 2.94^{+0.24}_{-0.23}$ & $\rm 2.59^{+0.3}_{-0.25}$ & 9 & 6.8\\
\candszf\  & 203020101 & 9.8  & 26 & $\rm 176^{+21}_{-18}$  & $\rm 2.15^{+0.26}_{-0.25}$ & 44 & 96.7 & $\rm 2.43^{+0.23}_{-0.22}$ & $3.1(3)$ & 35 & 79.4\\
\candseo\  & 303561001 & 7.8  & 11 & $\rm 186^{+34}_{-27}$  & $\rm 1.30^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ & 6  & 6.7  & 2.6(4) & $1.7(3)$ & 6 & 7.0\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\smallskip
$^a$ Exposure times are filtered for background flares.\\
$^b$ Observed flux refers to range 0.15--3~keV in units of $10^{-14}$~erg~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$.\\
$^c$ The ``goodness-of-fit'' is derived from a number of 1000 Monte Carlo simulated spectra.
\end{table}