\begin{table}%t1 \caption{\label{tab-masses}Observed and derived parameters for the 24~sources located in the region shown in Fig.~\ref{fig-exmap} and observed in NH$_3$~lines.} \small%\centerline { \begin{tabular}{llllllllllllll} \hline \hline Source & RA (J2000) & Dec (J2000) & Size & $v_{\rm LSR}$ & $R_G$ & $D_{\rm near}$ & $D_{\rm far}$ & $F_{\rm peak}$ & $F_{\rm int}$ & $T_{\rm kin}$ & $N({\rm H_2})$ & $M_{\rm near}$ & $M_{\rm far}$ \\ & & & $''$ & km~s$^{-1}$ & kpc & kpc & kpc & Jy/b. & Jy & K & $^{(1)}$ & $M_{\odot}$ & $M_{\odot}$ \\ \hline G18.55+0.04 & 18 24 37.85 & --12 45 14.8 & 36 $\times$ 24 & 36.3 & 5.6 & 3.1 & 13.0 & 0.92 & 2.8 & 21.0 & 2.1 & 140 & 2380 \\ G18.61--0.07 & 18 25 08.42 & --12 45 21.6 & 38 $\times$ 26 & 45.8 & 5.2 & {\bf 3.7} & 12.5 & 1.70 & 5.7 & 32.7$^{(2)}$ & 2.2 & {\bf 210} & 2490 \\ G18.63--0.07 & 18 25 09.84 & --12 44 07.5 & 53 $\times$ 21 & 45.7 & 5.2 & {\bf 3.6} & 12.5 & 0.96 & 3.6 & 14.7 & 3.9 & {\bf 420} & 5010 \\ G18.65--0.06 & 18 25 10.63 & --12 42 24.1 & 43 $\times$ 25 & 44.6 & 5.2 & {\bf 3.7} & 12.5 & 2.25 & 8.1 & 18.3 & 6.4 & {\bf 680} & 7940 \\ G18.66+0.04 & 18 24 50.98 & --12 39 20.8 & 36 $\times$ 24 & 80.9 & 4.0 & 5.2 & 10.9 & 2.10 & 6.3 & 22.4 & 4.5 & 780 & 3510 \\ G18.70+0.00 & 18 25 02.38 & --12 38 12.6 & 46 $\times$ 34 & 80.3 & 4.0 & 5.1 & 11.0 & 0.84 & 4.5 & 14.8 & 3.4 & 1030 & 4770 \\ G18.76+0.26 & 18 24 13.27 & --12 27 44.6 & 59 $\times$ 42 & 20.8 & 6.6 & 2.0 & {\bf 14.1} & 1.14 & 9.7 & 15.8 & 4.1 & 320 & {\bf 15090} \\ G18.79--0.29 & 18 26 15.53 & --12 41 36.2 & 40 $\times$ 34 & 65.5 & 4.4 & {\bf 4.5} & 11.6 & 0.94 & 4.3 & 14.4 & 4.0 & {\bf 830} & 5360 \\ G18.83--0.30 & 18 26 23.70 & --12 39 38.9 & 37 $\times$ 28 & 63.5 & 4.6 & {\bf 4.4} & 11.7 & 1.35 & 4.8 & --$^{(3)}$ & 5.3 & {\bf 800} & 5610 \\ G18.83--0.47 & 18 26 59.34 & --12 44 46.5 & 34 $\times$ 32 & 63.3 & 4.5 & {\bf 4.5} & 11.6 & 1.50 & 5.7 & 18.9 & 4.1 & {\bf 680} & 4600 \\ G18.83--0.49 & 18 27 03.57 & --12 45 06.5 & 58 $\times$ 25 & 65.2 & 4.5 & {\bf 4.5} & 11.6 & 1.34 & 6.7 & 20.8 & 3.2 & {\bf 720} & 4640 \\ G18.86--0.48 & 18 27 06.20 & --12 43 09.3 & 38 $\times$ 23 & 65.4 & 4.4 & {\bf 4.6} & 11.5 & 0.73 & 2.1 & 18.8 & 2.0 & {\bf 270} & 1710 \\ G18.88--0.49 & 18 27 09.21 & --12 42 35.1 & 38 $\times$ 25 & 65.5 & 4.5 & {\bf 4.5} & 11.6 & 1.11 & 3.5 & 22.4 & 2.4 & {\bf 340} & 2210 \\ G18.88--0.51 & 18 27 15.13 & --12 42 54.6 & 52 $\times$ 29 & 66.2 & 4.4 & {\bf 4.6} & 11.5 & 0.62 & 3.2 & 23.6 & 1.2 & {\bf 290} & 1840 \\ G18.89--0.47 & 18 27 07.82 & --12 41 38.0 & 64 $\times$ 34 & 66.1 & 4.4 & {\bf 4.6} & 11.5 & 3.39 & 25.4 & 25.9 & 5.9 & {\bf 2040} & 12840 \\ G18.89--0.64 & 18 27 43.46 & --12 45 48.5 & 28 $\times$ 22 & 64.1 & 4.5 & {\bf 4.5} & 11.6 & 0.58 & 1.2 & 20.0 & 1.5 & {\bf 130} & 880 \\ G18.91--0.63 & 18 27 43.55 & --12 44 51.0 & 50 $\times$ 43 & 64.5 & 4.5 & {\bf 4.5} & 11.6 & 1.51 & 11.1 & 17.1 & 4.8 & {\bf 1560} & 10340 \\ G18.93--0.01 & 18 25 32.35 & --12 26 41.4 & 27 $\times$ 25 & 46.3 & 5.1 & 3.7 & 12.4 & 1.33 & 3.1 & 29.3 & 2.0 & 140 & 1530 \\ G18.98--0.07 & 18 25 51.06 & --12 25 42.5 & 26 $\times$ 18 & 61.8 & 4.6 & {\bf 4.4} & 11.7 & 0.82 & 1.3 & 20.4 & 2.0 & {\bf 140} & 960 \\ G18.98--0.09 & 18 25 55.22 & --12 25 50.3 & 30 $\times$ 19 & 63.0 & 4.5 & {\bf 4.4} & 11.6 & 0.64 & 1.3 & 20.7 & 1.5 & {\bf 130} & 900 \\ G18.99--0.04 & 18 25 45.44 & --12 23 54.0 & 38 $\times$ 32 & 59.8 & 4.7 & {\bf 4.3} & 11.8 & 0.31 & 1.3 & 20.7 & 0.7 & {\bf 120} & 930 \\ G19.01--0.03 & 18 25 44.61 & --12 22 42.0 & 40 $\times$ 34 & 59.8 & 4.7 & {\bf 4.3} & 11.8 & 2.18 & 10.1 & 19.5 & 5.7 & {\bf 1070} & 8000 \\ G19.08--0.29 & 18 26 48.77 & --12 26 20.7 & 39 $\times$ 37 & 66.0 & 4.6 & {\bf 4.3} & 11.7 & 4.28 & 21.4 & 24.2 & 8.2 & {\bf 1700} & 12330 \\ G19.47+0.17 & 18 25 54.50 & --11 52 34.4 & 33 $\times$ 24 & 20.0 & 6.6 & 2.0 & {\bf 14.0} & 6.53 & 18.0 & 23.4 & 13.1 & 330 & {\bf 15510} \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \medskip Notes: $^{(1)}$~unit of $N({\rm H_2})$ is $10^{22}$~cm$^{-2}$; $^{(2)}$~this source was also observed in NH$_3$ by \citet{sridharan+2005}, with a better signal-to-noise ratio. We therefore use the kinetic temperature derived by this study rather than our own data for this source; $^{(3)}$~only the (1,~1)~transition of NH$_3$ is detected at this position, so that no kinetic temperature could be derived. A~temperature of 15~K has been assumed to compute masses and column density for this source. \\ When the distance ambiguity could be solved, the preferred distance and mass are shown in~boldface. \end{table}