\begin{table}%t1
\caption{\label{t1}Derived stellar parameters for \object{[OMN2000] LS1} as a function distance (Sects. 3.1 and 3.3).}
%\centerline
{
\small\begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccc}
\hline
Distance & $R_{\ast}$     & $T_{\rm eff}$ & log($L_{\ast}/L_{\odot}$) & H/He & $v_{\infty}$ & $\beta$ &
{\it f(r)} & $\dot M$ & $E$($B-V$) & $A_K$ & $M_K$ & M$_{\rm initial}$ \\
 (kpc) & ($R_{\odot}$)& (kK)      &                  &      & (km~s$^{-1}$) &      &
 & log($M_{\odot}$/yr) &    & & & ($M_{\odot}$)   \\
\hline
6  & 145.0 & 13.2 & 5.75 & 0.5 / 1.5  & 400 & 3.0 &0.08 & --4.2 / --4.6 &3.5 & 1.2  &--8.90 & $\sim$40\\
3.4&  82.5 & 13.4 & 5.30 & 0.5 / 1.5  & 400 & 3.0 &0.08 & --4.6 / --5.0 & 3.5 & 1.2 &--7.65 & $\sim$25\\
2  &  48.0 & 13.7 & 4.86 & 0.5 / 1.5  & 400 & 3.0 &0.08 & --4.9 / --5.3 &3.5 &  1.2 &--6.50& $\sim$17\\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
\par
 {As described in Sect. 3.2, H/He ratios suffer from a modest degeneracy, resulting in a reduction in 
the  mass loss rate by $\sim$60\% for the   H/He~=~1.5 model compared to H/He~=~0.5.  We further estimate systematic 
uncertainties of  $\pm$50~km~s$^{-1}$ in $v_{\infty}$, $\pm$300~K in $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\pm$0.1~dex 
in log($L_{\ast}/L_{\odot}$).} 
\end{table}