\begin{table}%t6
%\centering
\par
\caption{\label{table:testerror}Results of the photometric inversion of simulated Golevka-like shaped asteroids on two different asteroidal orbits.}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
\hline\hline 
Simulated & $\sigma$ & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\lambda$(pole)} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\beta$(pole)} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Period} &
 $b/a$ & $c/a$ & $k$ & $\epsilon$\\
Orbit & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(deg)} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(deg)} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{(h)} &   &
  & (mag/$^{\circ}$)  & (mag) \\
\hline 
319 & 0.01 & $45.8\pm0.2$ & $49.4\pm0.1$ & $19.150083\pm0.000003$ &
$0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.026\pm0.00$ & $0.039$ \\
319 & 0.02 & $48.5\pm0.3$ & $50.7\pm0.0$ & $19.150092\pm0.000005$ &
$0.64\pm0.00$ & $0.64\pm0.00$ & $0.025\pm0.00$ & $0.041$ \\
319 & 0.03 & $45.5\pm0.3$ & $50.5\pm0.3$ & $19.150048\pm0.000007$ &
$0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.025\pm0.00$ & $0.041$ \\
319 (1) & 0.04 & $190.1\pm0.6$ & $59.2\pm0.7$ &
$19.150129\pm0.000008$ & $0.65\pm0.00$ & $0.62\pm0.00$ & $0.026\pm0.00$ & $0.054$ \\
319 (2) & 0.04 & $45.5\pm0.5$ & $48.8\pm0.1$ &
$19.150096\pm0.000006$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.025\pm0.00$ & $0.055$ \\
319 (1) & 0.05 & $195.9\pm1.0$ & $54.7\pm0.6$ &
$19.150815\pm0.000010$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.63\pm0.01$ & $0.025\pm0.00$ & $0.076$ \\
319 (2) & 0.05 & $46.9\pm0.0$ & $46.3\pm0.0$ &
$19.150810\pm0.000000$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.024\pm0.00$ & $0.077$ \\
363 & 0.01 & $46.9\pm0.6$ & $51.9\pm0.2$ & $19.149544\pm0.000006$ &
$0.65\pm0.00$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.024\pm0.00$ & $0.046$ \\
363 & 0.02 & $45.0\pm0.8$ & $54.4\pm0.3$ & $19.149647\pm0.000007$ &
$0.66\pm0.00$ & $0.63\pm0.00$ & $0.024\pm0.00$ & $0.047$ \\
363 & 0.03 & $42.2\pm4.6$ & $54.6\pm2.5$ & $19.149698\pm0.000050$ &
$0.66\pm0.00$ & $0.62\pm0.03$ & $0.026\pm0.00$ & $0.051$ \\
363 & 0.04 & $42.4\pm3.1$ & $65.1\pm2.5$ & $19.149276\pm0.000040$ &
$0.68\pm0.01$ & $0.50\pm0.04$ & $0.022\pm0.00$ & $0.055$ \\
363 & 0.05 & $48.0\pm0.4$ & $48.3\pm0.1$ & $19.149446\pm0.000005$ &
$0.65\pm0.00$ & $0.65\pm0.00$ & $0.026\pm0.00$ & $0.054$ \\
\hline 
\end{tabular}
\begin{list}{}{}
\item[Note:] Simulated photometric errors were superimposed on each simulated observation. The errors are Gaussian, with different $\sigma$. $N$ is the number of simulated Gaia detections for each case. The spin parameters adopted to compute the simulated cases are: Pole $=(48.5^\circ, 51.0^\circ)$, Period~$= 19.150000$~h.
\end{list}
\end{table}