\begin{table}%T2 
\caption{\label{values}Best-fit model results from the CH$_3$OH analysis towards the two clumps. }
\small%\centerline
{
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
\hline\hline
Source &$S$&$n_{\rm H_2}$&$T$&$N_{\rm CH_3OH}$ & $x_{\rm CH_3OH}$\\
&$['']$&[cm$^{-3}$]&[K]&[cm$^{-2}$] & \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline
\noalign{\smallskip}
clump~1& 10 & $6^{+4}_{-3}\times 10^6$&$\rm 45^{+47}_{-17}$& $3^{+1}_{-1}\times 10^{14} $ & 2~$\times$~10$^{-9}$ \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
clump~3&8&$ 5^{+5}_{-2}\times 10^6   $&$\rm 35^{+17}_{-15}$& $ 3^{+3}_{-1}\times 10^{14}$ & 2~$\times$~10$^{-9}$ \\
\noalign{\smallskip}
\hline 
\end{tabular}}
\smallskip
The uncertainties correspond to the $3\sigma$ confidence level. The methanol column density ($N$) and fractional abundance relative to H$_2$ ($x$) is computed averaged over the extent of the clumps. 
\end{table}