\begin{table}%t3
\caption {\label{zz}Summary of \zphot accuracy achieved for the
individual low-$z$ and high-$z$ clusters.}
\include {10644_t1}
Notes: the information given in this table
is: (1) cluster identification, (2) filter set used to compute $z_{\rm phot}$, 
(3) spectroscopic $z_{\rm cluster}$, (4) $E(B-V)$ at
the cluster center, (5) total number of redshifts available in the field, 
(6) total number of spectroscopic redshifts used for 
accuracy determinations, and \zphot accuracy achieved with {\it Hyperz}
and GR codes: (7) (13) systematic deviation between \zphot and $z_{\rm spec}$,
(8) (14) standard deviation $\sigma_z$, 
(9) (15) median absolute deviation ($\sigma_{z,\rm MAD}$),
(10) (16) normalized median absolute deviation ($\sigma(\Delta z/(1+z))$),
(11) (17) fraction of catastrophic identifications~($l\%$),
(12) (18) fraction of spurious identifications~($g\%$). Clusters excluded in
the computation of the averaged accuracy are given in italic (see text). 
The spectroscopic $z_{\rm cluster}$ in Col.~(3) corresponds to the most
prominent cluster in the field. Other clusters have been identified in 
cl1037 ($z=0.578$),
cl1103 ($z=0.959$ and 0.626),
cl1138 ($z=0.455$),
cl1227 ($z=0.583$),
cl1301 ($z=0.397$), and
cl1354 ($z=0.595$) (see Milvang-Jensen et~al.\ \cite{MilvangJensen08}, for details).
\end{table}