\begin{table}%t1 \caption{\label{tab_maxfit_R0.6}Information about the identifyed radio sources in the core of MS0451.} \small %\centerline { \begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc} \hline\hline \noalign{\smallskip} Name & RA ($+4^{\rm h}$ $54^{\rm m}$) & Dec ($- 3^{\circ}$) & $S_{\rm Pk}$ & $S_{2\sigma}$ & $S_{\rm CC}$ & $S_{\rm resid}$ & $\frac{S_{\rm CC} - S_{2\sigma}}{S_{2\sigma}}$ & $\frac{S_{\rm CC} - S_{\rm Gauss}}{S_{\rm Gauss}}$ & {\it SNR} \\ & J2000 (s) & J2000 ($\arcmin$,$\arcsec$)& ($\rm \mu Jy~beam^{-1}$) & ($\mu$Jy) & ($\mu$Jy) & ($\mu$Jy) & ($\%$) & ($\%$) & & \\ \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip} E1 & $12.78 \pm 0.01$ & $00:43.8 \pm 0.2$ & $66\pm10$ & $42.5 \pm12$ & 61.6 & -1.4 & 45 & 17 & 6.4 \\ CR1 & $12.88 \pm 0.01$ & $00:53.5 \pm 0.2$ & $47\pm10$ & $36.6 \pm12$ & 47.2 & 2.9 & 29 & $-16$ & 4.6 \\ CR2 & $12.86 \pm 0.01$ & $00:59.3 \pm 0.2$ & $47\pm10$ & $43.8 \pm12$ & 60.1 & -0.1 & 37 & $-21$ & 4.6 \\ E2 & $12.66 \pm 0.01$ & $01:01.2 \pm 0.2$ & $51\pm10$ & $43.2 \pm12$ & 52.0 & 5.1 & 20 & $-15$ & 5.0 \\ RJ bright & $12.54 \pm 0.01$ & $01:17.2 \pm 0.1$ & $92\pm10$ & $121.2\pm17$ & 135.9 & -- & 12 & $-17$ & 8.9 \\ RJ & $12.54 \pm 0.01$ & $01:17.2 \pm 0.1$ & $92\pm10$ & $168.0\pm22$ & 195.3 & 10.5 & 16 & -- & 8.9 \\ E3 & $10.97 \pm 0.01$ & $01:24.8 \pm 0.2$ & $54\pm10$ & $63.3 \pm15$ & 66.8 & 6.5 & 5 & $-28$ & 5.2 \\ \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip} %Fb & & $ $ & & & & & & 3.97 \\ Fd & $15.162 \pm 0.003 $ & $01:10.83 \pm 0.05$ & $199 \pm10$ & $1180.9\pm42 $ & 1260 & 29.5 & 7 & -- & 19.2 \\ Fe & $09.2733 \pm 0.0007 $ & $00:50.90 \pm 0.01$ & $1068\pm10$ & $1769.2\pm34 $ & 1870 & 16.3 & 6 & -- & 103.3 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \smallskip The columns show: position (RA, Dec), peak flux density ($S_{\rm Pk}$), total flux density inside the 2$\sigma$~contour ($S_{\rm 2\sigma}$), total flux density obtained by adding the flux from all the clean components used to model the source ($S_{\rm CC}$), total flux density inside the 2$\sigma$ contour in the residual map ($S_{\rm resid}$), comparison between the total flux derived from the CC~model and the $2~\sigma$ contours $\left( \frac{S_{\rm CC} - S_{2\sigma}}{S_{2\sigma}} \right)$, comparison between the total flux derived from the CC~model and the Gaussian fit $\left( \frac{S_{\rm CC} - S_{\rm Gauss}}{S_{\rm Gauss}} \right)$ and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The quoted errors in RA and DEC correspond to the expected positional uncertainty of a point-like source in the map ($\emph{FWHM} / 2 \times \emph{SNR}$, were \emph{FWHM} is the full with half maximum of the clean beam), while the error in the flux peak is estimated to be the same as the rms noise of the map. The error in the $2\sigma$ flux was calculated as ${\rm rms} \times \sqrt{N}$, where rms is the rms noise of the map, and \emph{N} is the number of beams within the area delimited by the $2\sigma$ contour of the source. The raw ``RJ bright'' lists the fluxes for RJ estimated withouth taking into account the $4\sigma$ west extension. Note that the positions listed here were derived before aligning the radio map respect to the HST image. \end{table}