\begin{table}%t2 \par \caption{\label{t2}{\it XMM-Newton} and {\it Chandra} spectral fitting results (errors are at 90\% confidence).} %\centerline {\tiny \begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c c c c c c c} \hline\hline \noalign{\smallskip} Year & Satellite & Source & {\tt mekal} & {\tt mekal} & {\tt mekal} & {\tt mekal} & Gauss & Gauss & Gauss & Gauss & $\chi^2$ & $\chi^2$ & GOES-10 \\ of & (observation & net & $kT$\tablefootmark{a} & norm\tablefootmark{b} & flux\tablefootmark{c} & 0.2--2.0 keV & energy & norm\tablefootmark{e} & flux\tablefootmark{f} & emitted &/dof\tablefootmark{g} &/dof\tablefootmark{g} & 1--8~\AA \\ obs. & number) & counts & & & & emitted & (keV) & & & power\tablefootmark{d} (MW) & & no line & flux\tablefootmark{i} \\ &&&&&& power\tablefootmark{d} (MW)&&&&&&\\\hline \noalign{\smallskip} 2002 & {\it XMM-Newton} (1) & 112 &0.28$^{\rm +0.06}_{\rm -0.04}$ & 4.3$^{\rm +1.2}_{\rm -1.1}$ & 1.04$^{\rm +0.36}_{\rm -0.28}$ & 230$^{\rm +80}_{\rm -62}$ & 0.48$^{\rm +0.04}_{\rm -0.05}$ & 2.6$^{\rm +1.7}_{\rm -1.8}$ &0.20$^{\rm +0.13}_{\rm -0.14}$ & 44$^{\rm +29}_{\rm -30}$ & 0.9/5 & 7.0/7 & 1.13 \\[1mm] \vspace{1 mm} 2003 & {\it Chandra} (1) & 137 & $0.65\pm{0.19}$ &1.3$\pm${0.4} & 0.37$^{\rm +0.10}_{\rm -0.12}$ & 94$^{\rm +25}_{\rm -30}$ & 0.55$^{\rm +0.02}_{\rm -0.01}$ & $5.9\pm{1.5}$ & $0.53\pm{0.13}$ & $135\pm{34}$ & 8.6/9 & 32.6/11 & 2.12 \\[1mm] \vspace{1 mm} 2004 & {\it Chandra} (2) & 112 & 0.59$^{\rm +0.15}_{\rm -0.28}$ & 3.1$^{\rm +0.7}_{\rm -0.8}$ & 0.90$^{\rm +0.10}_{\rm -0.35}$ & 167$^{\rm +19}_{\rm -65}$ & 0.57$\pm${0.03} & 4.9$^{\rm +2.3}_{\rm -2.1}$ & 0.44$^{\rm +0.21}_{\rm -0.19}$ & 82$^{\rm +38}_{\rm -35}$ & 12.2/10 & 16.7/12 & 3.23 \\[1mm] \vspace{1 mm} 2004 & {\it Chandra} (3) & 42 & 0.61$^{\rm +0.84}_{\rm -0.36}$ & 0.7$^{\rm +0.8}_{\rm -0.4}$ & 0.19$^{\rm +0.15}_{\rm -0.12}$ & 36$^{\rm +28}_{\rm -23}$ & 0.56$^{\rm +0.05}_{\rm -0.03}$ & 4.3$^{\rm +1.8}_{\rm -2.4}$ & 0.39$^{\rm +0.16}_{\rm -0.22}$ & 74$^{\rm +31}_{\rm -41}$ & 0.22/1 & 5.2/3 & 0.16 \\[1mm] \vspace{1 mm} 2005 & {\it XMM-Newton} (2) & 146 & 0.33$^{\rm +0.12}_{\rm -0.08}$ & $1.1\pm{0.4}$ & 0.27$^{\rm +0.15}_{\rm -0.10}$ & 65$^{\rm +36}_{\rm -24}$ & $0.52\pm{0.02}$ & $1.7\pm{0.7}$ & $0.15\pm{0.06}$ & $36\pm{15}$ & 17.4/16 & 33.3/18 & 0.22 \\[1mm] 2005 & {\it XMM-Newton} (3) & $<$44$^h$ & 0.33 & $<$0.3$^h$ & $<$0.08$^h$ & $<$19$^h$ & 0.52 & $<$0.51$^h$ & $<$0.05$^h$ & $<$12$^h$ & & & 0.004 \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \tablefoot{\tablefoottext{a}{{\tt mekal} temperature in~keV.} \tablefoottext{b}{{\tt mekal} normalisation at 1~keV in units of 10$^{\rm -6}$ ph cm$^{\rm -2}$ s$^{\rm -1}$~keV$^{\rm -1}$.} \tablefoottext{c}{Total 0.2--2.0~keV energy flux in the {\tt mekal} component in units of 10$^{\rm -14}$ erg cm$^{\rm -2}$ s$^{\rm -1}$; the errors on the fluxes were obtained by varying the {\tt mekal} temperatures and normalisations between their 90\% confidence limits.} \tablefoottext{d}{Powers and errors calculated by multiplying the values in the previous column by 4$\pi${\it d}$^2$, where {\it d} is the geocentric distance of Saturn at the given epoch.} \tablefoottext{e}{Gaussian line normalisation in units of 10$^{\rm -6}$ ph cm$^{\rm -2}$ s$^{\rm -1}$.} \tablefoottext{f}{Total energy flux in the line in units of 10$^{\rm -14}$ erg cm$^{\rm -2}$ s$^{\rm -1}$.} \tablefoottext{g}{$\chi^2$ value and degrees of freedom.} \tablefoottext{h}{3$\sigma$ upper limit.} \tablefoottext{i}{Solar X-ray flux (1.5--12.4~keV) in units of 10$^{\rm -6}$ Watt~m$^{\rm -2}$, corrected for solar rotation (see text).}} \vspace*{2mm} \end{table}