\begin{table}%t2
\caption{\label{t:chosenlines}Different molecular features and the properties of the specific lines
used for the line profile modelling here (and in Papers~I and~II).}
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{llcc}
\hline\hline \noalign{\smallskip}
&\multicolumn{3}{c}{Specific line chosen for modelling}\\
\multicolumn{1}{c}{Line type}&designation&$\sigma / wn$ [cm$^{-1}$]&$\lambda$
[$\mu$m]\\
\hline
CN $\Delta v$ = --2  red&1--3 Q$_2$4.5&4871.3400&2.0528\\
CO $\Delta v$ = 3&5--2 P30&6033.8967&1.6573\\
{\it CO $\Delta v$ = 2  high-exc.}&{\it 2--0 R82}&{\it 4321.2240}&{\it 2.3142}\\
\hline
CO $\Delta v$ = 2  low-exc.&2--0 R19&4322.0657&2.3137\\
\hline
CO $\Delta v$ = 1&1--0 R1&2150.8560&4.6493\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\tablefoot {The lines were chosen according to the criteria given in Sect.~5.1 of Paper~I. The values given here correspond to the rest wavelengths or central frequencies~$\nu_0$ as used in~Eq.~(\ref{e:kappaLL}). Throughout this work we will use only a low-excitation first overtone CO~line (i.e.~CO~2$-$0~R19) denoted by CO~$\Delta v$~=~2, while the high-excitation line CO~2$-$0~R82 is merely listed for completeness as it was used in Papers~I and~II. This distinction is necessary as the two types of lines (at~least the ones used by HHR82 and similar studies) behave differently in kinematics studies (see~Fig.~\ref{f:rvs-chicyg-scep}).}
\vspace*{-3mm}
\end{table}