\begin{table}%t2
%\centering
\par
\caption{\label{tab:results}Mass values computed for $M_{200}$ by model fitting using an SIS profile, an NFW profile, and a constrained NFW~(MNFW), according to \cite{bullock01}.}
\begin{tabular}{lllllll}
\hline\hline \noalign{\smallskip}
  &  & KSB  &   &  & Shapelets &  \\
%\hline
 Parameter & MNFW &  NFW  & SIS & MNFW & NFW & SIS  \\
\hline  \noalign{\smallskip}
$M_{200} (10^{14})$& $\rm 5.3_{-1.2}^{+1.4}$ & $\rm 5.6_{-2.7}^{+4.7}$ &  & $\rm 5.3_{-0.8}^{+0.8}$ & $\rm 5.9 _{-1.7}^{+2.2}$	&\\[1.5mm] 
$r_{200}$ (kpc)	& $\rm 1513_{-123}^{+119}$ & $\rm 1545_{-306}^{+345}$&  & $\rm 1516_{-78}^{+77}$ & $\rm 1570_{-170}^{+177}$ &	\\[1.5mm] 
$c_{\rm vir}$ 	& 4.51 	& $\rm 3.9_{-2.1}^{+5.6}$ &  & 4.50 & $\rm 3.7_{-1.3}^{+2.2}$ &  \\[1.5mm] 
$\sigma_{cl}$ (km~s$^{-1}$)&  &  & $\rm 778_{-27}^{+26}$ &  &   &  $\rm 781_{-27}^{+26}$   \\[1.5mm]
%\hline
$red. \chi^2$  &  1.46 & 2.02 & 1.94 & 1.62 & 2.12 & 2.31 \\[1.5mm]
   $Q$     &  0.21 & 0.11 & 0.10 & 0.17 & 0.10 & 0.06 \\[1.5mm]
\hline
\end{tabular}
\tablefoot{Best fit parameters and reduced $\chi^2$ are listed for each fit performed using both KSB and shapelet shear catalogs, together with the goodness-of-fit probability~$Q$.}
\end{table}