\begin{table}%t1 %\centering \par \caption{\label{tab:models}Key initial model parameters and some results.} \begin{tabular}{c c c c c c r l c l c c } \hline\hline \noalign{\smallskip} Model & $Q$ & $\cal{C}$ & $M_{{\rm BH}}$ & $R_{{\rm NS}}$ & $d_{{\rm i}}$ & $L$ & $\Delta x$ & $M_{{\rm u}}$ & $M_{{\rm b}}$ & $M_{{\rm g}}$ & $|$h/l$|$ \\ & && $M_\odot$ & km & km & km & km & $M_\odot$ & $M_\odot$ & $M_\odot$ & \\ \hline M5.145 & 5 & 0.145 & 7.0 & 14.3 & 92 & 1550 & 0.77 & 0.07 & 0.08 & 0.15 & N \\ M4.145 & 4 & 0.145 & 5.6 & 14.3 & 80 & 1400 & 0.68 & 0.08 & 0.10 & 0.18 & Y \\ M3.145 & 3 & 0.145 & 4.2 & 14.3 & 68 & 1100 & 0.54 & 0.06 & 0.09 & 0.15 & Y \\ M2.145 & 2 & 0.145 & 2.8 & 14.3 & 56 & 880 & 0.43 & $<$$10^{-2}$ & 0.07 & 0.08 & Y \\ M5.160 & 5 & 0.160 & 7.0 & 12.9 & 92 & 1550 & 0.77 & 0.01 & 0.05 & 0.06 & -- \\ M4.160 & 4 & 0.160 & 5.6 & 12.9 & 76 & 1250 & 0.61 & 0.03 & 0.06 & 0.09 & N \\ M3.160 & 3 & 0.160 & 4.2 & 12.9 & 66 & 1100 & 0.54 & 0.03 & 0.06 & 0.09 & N \\ M2.160 & 2 & 0.160 & 2.8 & 12.9 & 52 & 820 & 0.40 & $<$$10^{-2}$ & 0.04 & 0.05 & Y \\ M5.180 & 5 & 0.180 & 7.0 & 11.5 & 88 & 1500 & 0.73 & $<$$10^{-3}$ & $<$$10^{-3}$ & $<$$10^{-3}$ & N \\ M4.180 & 4 & 0.180 & 5.6 & 11.5 & 76 & 1250 & 0.61 & $<$$10^{-3}$ & $<$$10^{-3}$ & $<$$10^{-3}$ & N \\ M3.180 & 3 & 0.180 & 4.2 & 11.5 & 64 & 1050 & 0.51 & $<$$10^{-2}$ & 0.01 & 0.01 & N \\ M2.180 & 2 & 0.180 & 2.8 & 11.5 & 50 & 780 & 0.38 & $<$$10^{-3}$ & 0.004 & 0.004 & N \\ \hline \end{tabular} \tablefoot{Initial parameters: mass ratio $Q$, compactness $\cal{C}$, black hole mass $M_{{\rm BH}}$, neutron star radius $R_{{\rm NS}}$, initial orbital distance $d_{{\rm i}}$, size of largest grid $L$, size of finest zone $\Delta x = L/2048$. The mass of the NS is $1.4~M_\odot$ in all cases. Values at the end of the simulation, only for high-resolution models: unbound+ejected gas mass $M_{{\rm u}}$, bound neutron star mass around BH~$M_{{\rm b}}$, neutron star mass not instantly accreted by BH~$M_{{\rm g}}$, $|$h/l$|$ states whether the difference between values for $M_{{\rm g}}$ in low-resolution and high-resolution simulations is less than $20\%$ (Yes/No; `-' no low-res model computed). The spin-up of the BH~by accretion of matter is not taken into account.} \end{table}