\begin{table}%t3 \caption{\label{table:3}Global astrometric solution for WFI CCD mosaics. } %\centering \par \begin{tabular}{c c c c c c} \hline\hline \noalign{\smallskip} Sky & Zero-point & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(RA, Dec)--UCAC2} & UCAC2~\\ path & offset before G.S. & before G.S. & after G.S. & stars~ \\ & $\Delta\alpha$cos$\delta$ ~ $\Delta\delta$ ~ & $\sigma_{\alpha}$ ~ $\sigma_{\delta}$ & $\sigma_{\alpha}$ $\sigma_{\delta}$ & \\ Year & mas mas & mas mas & mas mas & \\ \hline 2008 & $-$13 ~ $-$04 & 112 ~ 107 & 59 ~ 58 & 6001 ~ \\ 2009 & $-$09 ~ $-$01 & 112 ~ 103 & 58 ~ 55 & 4693 ~ \\ 2010 & $-$03 ~ $-$03 & 133 ~ 126 & 59 ~ 57 & 11013 ~ \\ 2011 & $-$08 ~ $-$03 & 134 ~ 129 & 61 ~ 59 & 8988 ~ \\ 2012 & $-$06 ~ $-$05 & 139 ~ 131 & 62 ~ 61 & 7563 ~ \\ 2013 & $-$03 ~ $-$04 & 145 ~ 141 & 63 ~ 62 & 6068 ~ \\ 2014 & $-$06 ~ $+$02 & 135 ~ 138 & 60 ~ 60 & 6439 ~ \\ 2015 & $-$06 ~ $-$03 & 100 ~ 098 & 57 ~ 57 & 7524 ~ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \tablefoot {Tangent plane technique results. Zero point position offsets were computed from averaged observed minus UCAC2 star position differences, before applying the global mosaic solution procedure~(G.S.). Due to the tangent plane technique, by definition they are zero after G.S. process. The~($\sigma_{\alpha}$, $\sigma_{\delta}$)s of tangent plane technique solutions refer to observed minus UCAC2~positions computed before and after the G.S.~procedure. The last column is the number of used UCAC2 reference stars (see details in Sect.~4.3).} \end{table}