\begin{table}%t1
%\centering
\par
\caption{\label{tab1}Results for synthetic clusters studied by the fitting method.}
\begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
\hline\hline
{Cluster} & {$N_{\rm stars}$} & {Contamination (\%)} & {3$\sigma_{\rm phot}$(\%)} & {$E(B-V)$(mag)} & {Distance (pc)} & {$\log(Age)$ (yr)} \\
\hline
SC~01     & 432 & 0\%  & 1.0  & $0.40 \pm 0.01$ & $2112 \pm 51$  & $8.65 \pm 0.05$  \\  
  SC~02     & 480 & 20\% & 1.0  & $0.40 \pm 0.01$ & $2062 \pm 43$  & $8.71 \pm 0.05$  \\ 
  SC~03     & 444 & 50\% & 1.0  & $0.38 \pm 0.01$ & $2073 \pm 30$  & $8.70 \pm 0.07$  \\ 
  SC~04     & 65  & 0\%  & 1.0  & $0.38 \pm 0.02$ & $2008 \pm 94$  & $8.70 \pm 0.07$  \\
  SC~05     & 113 & 20\% & 1.0  & $0.40 \pm 0.03$ & $2060 \pm 60$  & $8.75 \pm 0.06$  \\
  SC~06     & 61  & 50\% & 1.0  & $0.40 \pm 0.02$ & $2102 \pm 58$  & $8.70 \pm 0.07$  \\
  \hline
\end{tabular}
\tablefoot{Synthetic clusters were generated with parameters $\log$(age)~=~8.70~yr, distance~=~2100~pc,  $E(B-V) = 0.40$, $Z = 0.019$) and $N_{\rm stars}$, including the given contamination fraction    and photometric accuracy of 3$\sigma_{\rm phot}$.}
\vspace*{3.5mm}
\end{table}