\begin{table}%t2
\caption{\label{seven}The open clusters with very low [Fe/H] estimates from Tadross (\cite{Tadross2001}) and the comparison with those from Tadross (\cite{Tadross2003}).}
%%\centerline

{\small
\begin{tabular}{lcccrrcccrrrr}
\hline
\hline
Cluster &	&	[Fe/H]$_{01}$ &	[Fe/H]$_{03}$ &	\multicolumn{1}{c}{$d$} &	\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma$} & $N$ & 
$E(B-V)$ & $\sigma$ & $N$ & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Age} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma$} & $N$ \\
	&	&	[dex] &	[dex] &	\multicolumn{1}{c}{[pc]} &	\multicolumn{1}{c}{[pc]} & & [mag] & [mag] &
	& [Myr] & [Myr] \\
\hline
Berkeley 7	&	C0150+621 &	$-$1.75	&	$-$0.25 & 2509	& 195	& 3 &	0.80	& 0.00	& 3	& 4	& 1	& 3 \\						
Berkeley 30	&	C0655+032 &	$-$2.67	& +0.10 & 3990	& 1140	& 5	& 0.50	& 0.07	& 5	& 565	& 350	& 5 \\
Berkeley 60	&	C0015+606 &	$-$2.26	&	$-$0.77	&	3245	&	1634	&	2	&	0.62	&	0.35	&	2	&	160	&	3	& 2 \\
Berkeley 62	&	C0057+636 &	$-$2.39	&	$-$0.85	&	2063	&	400	& 6	&	0.84	&	0.04	& 6	&	17	&	12 & 6 \\
NGC 581	&	C0129+604 &	$-$1.54	&	$-$0.85	&	2569	&	229	&	9 &	0.41	&	0.03	& 10 &	21	&	9 & 11 \\
NGC 1750	&	C0500+235 &	$-$1.97	&	$-$0.69	& 646	& 20	& 3	& 0.34	& 0.01	& 3	& 217	& 30	& 3 \\
NGC 2244	&	C0629+049 &	$-$1.77	&	$-$0.46	&	1595	&	119	&	9 &	0.46	&	0.03	&	10 &	5	&	2 &	10 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\tablefoot{The cluster parameters are based on the list by Paunzen \& Netopil (\cite{Paunzen2006}).}
\end{table}