\begin{table} %[!ht]%t3 %\centering \par \caption{\label{tab3}Determination of $A_{V}$, $R$ from common upper level PH lines, and $R$ derived from stellar photometry.} \vspace*{-2mm} %%% ----------------------------- t % \par % \par \begin{tabular}{lcrclclcc} \hline \hline\noalign{\smallskip} & &\multicolumn{4}{l}{PH Emission Lines} &\multicolumn{2}{l}{Stellar Photometry} & \\ Object & Obs.\tablefootmark{a} & PH~Pairs\tablefootmark{b} & $A_{V}$(mag) & $R$\tablefootmark{c} & $A_{V}$(H$\alpha$--H$\beta$)\tablefootmark{d} & Star/Cluster & $R$ & Ref. \\ \hline M~8 & TP & 7~[6--12] & 2.10 & 4.35 & & Herschel~36 & 4.6--5.6, 5.3 & 2, 3 \\ & G-R & 11~[7--20] & 2.20 & 6.1~(5.0)\tablefootmark{e} & 2.1(1.4) & NGC~6523 & 4.6 & 4 \\ M~16 & G-R & 9~[7--18] & 2.80 & 5.2~(3.1,4.8)\tablefootmark{f} & 3.2(2.3) & NGC~6611 & 4.8 & 5 \\ M~17 & TP & 7~[6--12] & 3.50 & 4.1 & 2.35(2.0) & NGC~6618 & 4.2 & 1 \\ & G-R & 9~[7--18] & 3.05 & 4.3~(3.1) & 3.4(2.7) & Star~1~(Fig.~\ref{fig1}, \ref{fig5}) & 4.5 $\pm$ 0.25 & TP \\ M~20 & G-R & 14~[7--22] & 1.05 & 5.5~(3.1) & 0.8(0.8) & HD~164492 & 5.1 & 6, 7 \\ & & & & & & HD~164492 & 3.1 & 8 \\ M~42 & E & 9~[7--19] & 2.15 & 5.8 & 2.2(1.5) & $\theta$$^{1}$ Ori~C & 5.5 & 9 \\ NGC~3603 & G-R & 8~[9--18] & 6.9 & 5.4~(3.1) & 7.4(5.5) & NGC~3603 & 4.3 & 10 \\ S~311 & G-R & 10~[7--18] & 1.90 & 5.5~(3.1) & 2.1(1.5) & [NGC~2467 & 1.8--3.9] & 11 \\ NGC~7027 & Z-R & 16~[6--22] & 3.9 & 4.4~(3.1)\tablefootmark{g} & 4.0~(3.1) & & & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \vspace*{-1.5mm} \tablefoot{ \tablefoottext{a}{Observer, TP: this paper, G-R: Garcia-Rojas et~al. (\cite{Garcia2005}, \cite{Garcia2006}), E: Esteban et~al. (\cite{Esteban2004}), Z-R: Zhang et~al. (\cite{Zhang2005}) and Rudy et~al. (\cite{Rudy1992}).} \tablefoottext{b}{Number of line pairs, in brackets the range of quantum numbers considered.} \tablefoottext{c}{Determined from relation (2); values in brackets used by G-R.} \tablefoottext{d}{From H$\alpha$--H$\beta$ ratio and $R$ of Col.~5; in brackets for $R = 3.1$.} \tablefoottext{e}{For 4100~\AA\ $<$ $\lambda$, for shorter $\lambda$ see Garcia-Rojas et~al. (\cite{Garcia2007}).} \tablefoottext{f}{$R = 3.1$ for 5500~\AA\ $<$ $\lambda$, $R = 4.8$ for $\lambda$ $<$ 5500~\AA.} \tablefoottext{g}{Value usually taken.}} \vspace*{-3mm} \tablebib{1: Chini et~al. (\cite{Chini1980}), Chini $\&$ Kr\"ugel (\cite{Chini1983}), Hoffmeister et~al. (\cite{Hoffmeister2008}); 2: Hecht et~al. (\cite{Hecht1982}): 4.6--5.6; 3: Cardelli et~al. (\cite{Cardelli1989}): 5.0; 4: McCall et~al. (\cite{McCall1990}); 5: Chini et~al. (\cite{Chini1980}), Chini $\&$ Wargau (\cite{Chini1990}), Chini et~al. (\cite{Chini1992}); 6: Anderson (\cite{Anderson1970}); 7: Lynds et~al. (\cite{Lynds1985}); 8: Kohoutek et~al. (\cite{Kohoutek1999}); 9: Cardelli $\&$ Clayton (\cite{Cardelli1988}); 10: Pandey et~al. (\cite{Pandey2000}); 11: Grubissich (\cite{Grubissich1969}), NGC~2467 may not be a physical cluster.} \end{table}