\begin{table}%t1 \caption{\label{VFstrapping}Coefficients for Eq.~(\ref{twarogeqn}).} %\centering \par \begin{tabular}{l r r c r r r r l} \hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip} Study & Ref. & \# of stars & \# of stars with & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$a$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$b$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$c$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$d$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\sigma$} \\ & & & $(b-y)_{0}>0.6$\\ \hline Favata et~al. (1997) & 2 & 46 & 1 & 1.0608 & --0.9662 & --0.7918 & 7.1781 & 0.07 \\ Feltzing \& Gustafsson (1998) & 3 & 23 & 2 & 0.7903 & --0.8958 & --0.1252 & 3.9841 & 0.05 \\ Chen et~al. (2000) & 4 & 28 & 1 & 1.1759 & --2.0582 & --0.0767 & 8.2072 & 0.06 \\ Thor\'{e}n \& Feltzing (2000) & 5 & 12 & 4 & 0.9918 & 0.0163 & --0.2020 & 0.8187 & 0.08 \\ Santos et~al. (2001) & 6 & 61 & 1 & 1.0405 & --0.9088 & --0.0586 & 3.6431 & 0.04 \\ Heiter \& Luck (2003) & 7 & 75 & 0 & 0.8985 & 0.7027 & --0.1373 & --2.0303 & 0.05 \\ Yong \& Lambert (2003) & 8 & 6 & 2 & 1.1258 & 2.0980 & --0.2534 & --6.3255 & 0.05 \\ Mishenina et~al. (2004) & 9 & 93 & 1 & 1.1434 & --1.8958 & --0.0888 & 7.5583 & 0.06 \\ Santos et~al. (2004) & 10 & 141 & 1 & 1.0098 & --1.2361 & --0.0838 & 5.0008 & 0.04 \\ Bonfils et~al. (2005) & 11 & 19 & 0 & 0.8761 & --0.5454 & --0.0422 & 2.2801 & 0.07 \\ Luck \& Heiter (2005) & 12 & 65 & 6 & 0.9736 & 0.7346 & --0.0249 & --2.6251 & 0.06 \\ Santos et~al. (2005) & 13 & 64 & 7 & 1.0495 & --1.1400 & --0.0204 & 4.3450 & 0.04 \\ Woolf \& Wallerstein (2005) & 14 & 8 & 6 & 1.0192 & 0.0846 & --0.4226 & 1.5298 & 0.04 \\ Sousa et~al. (2006) & 15 & 57 & 1 & 0.9360 & --0.9590 & --0.0805 & 3.9268 & 0.02 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \tablefoot {Column 1 lists the study that is being moved onto the \citet{2005ApJS..159..141V} system and Col.~2 the reference number used in Table~\ref{tabB.1}. Column~3 lists the number of stars in common with \citet{2005ApJS..159..141V}. These are used to obtain the coefficients. Column~4 lists the number of stars redder than $(b-y)_0=0.6$. Columns~5 to~8 list the coefficients used in Eq.~(\ref{twarogeqn}), and Col.~9 lists the $\sigma$ for the difference between [Fe/H] in the study listed in Col.~1 and the [Fe/H] derived once the data have been put on to the \citet{2005ApJS..159..141V} system. The difference is calculated in the sense [Fe/H]$_{\rm original}$~minus [Fe/H]$_{\rm corrected}$.} \vspace*{0.5mm} \end{table}