\begin{table}%t2 \par \caption{\label{tablines}Water and CO~line emission toward NGC~7129 FIRS~2.} \scriptsize %\centering \par \begin{tabular}{r r c c c c c} \hline \hline\noalign{\smallskip} Transition & Component & rms\tablefootmark{a} & $T_{\rm MB}^{\rm peak}$\tablefootmark{b} & $\int T_{\rm MB}~{\rm d}\varv$ \tablefootmark{b}& $V_{\rm LSR}$\tablefootmark{c} & {\it FWHM}\tablefootmark{d} \\ & & (mK) & (K) & (K~km~s$^{-1}$) & (km~s$^{-1}$) & (km~s$^{-1}$) \\ \hline\noalign{\smallskip} H$_2$$^{16}$O~1$_{11}$--0$_{00}$ & no Gaussian fit & 16 & 0.59& 8.4 &--8.2 & \\ 2$_{02}$--1$_{11}$ & narrow& 20 & 0.36 & 2.3 & --7.2 & 6.2\\ & broad & 20 & 0.23 & 6.1 & --12.4& 24.6\\ 2$_{11}$--2$_{02}$ &narrow & 16 & 0.21 & 1.5 & --7.5 & 6.5\\ &broad & 16 & 0.11 & 3.1& --13.7& 26.8\\ 3$_{12}$--3$_{03}$ &narrow & 16 & 0.14 & 1.7 & --7.3 & 7.8 \\ &broad & 16 & 0.11 & 2.8 & --14.5 & 24.4 \\ H$_2$$^{18}$O~1$_{10}$--1$_{01}$ && 5 & 0.015 & 0.071 & --8.5 & 5.3 \\ H$_2$$^{18}$O~2$_{02}$--1$_{11}$ & not seen & 5 & &$<$0.010\tablefootmark{e} & & \\ C$^{18}$O\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5--4 & &5 & 0.16 & 0.49 & --9.8& 2.1 \\ $^{13}$CO~\ \ \ \ \ 10--9 & & 20 & 0.13 & 0.44 & --9.8& 5.5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \tablefoot{\tablefoottext{a}{The rms measure is taken over a 1~km~s$^{-1}$ range.}\\ \tablefoottext{b}{Uncertainties in the peak temperature and integrated line intensity are dominated by calibration issues. For H$_2$$^{16}$O~1$_{11}$--0$_{00}$, 2$_{02}$--1$_{11}$, 3$_{12}$--3$_{03}$, and $^{13}$CO~10--9 the uncertainty is 32\%. For all other lines the uncertainty is 16\%. }\\ \tablefoottext{c}{Velocity accuracy better than $\sim$0.5 km~s$^{-1}$.}\\ \tablefoottext{d}{A 20\% uncertainty in the line widths is due primarily to the component separation.}\\ \tablefoottext{e}{The 3$\sigma$ detection limit, for data smoothed to the expected line width (5~km~s$^{-1}$), is 0.015 K.}} \vspace*{-2mm} \end{table}