Table 5
List of all best fit relations of the CAIXAvar sample as well as their probabilities.
| Relation | 80 ks | 40 ks | 20 ks | 10 ks | ||||||||
| Norm | Slope | Prob | Norm | Slope | Prob | Norm | Slope | Prob | Norm | Slope | Prob | |
|
|
||||||||||||
| CAIXAvar | ||||||||||||
vs. ![]() |
0.51 ± 0.25 | 1.25 ± 0.13 | 99.999 | −0.03 ± 0.19 | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 99.999 | 0.13 ± 0.24 | 1.08 ± 0.12 | 99.999 | 0.13 ± 0.21 | 1.08 ± 0.09 | 99.999 |
vs. ![]() |
0.42 ± 0.19 | 1.19 ± 0.10 | 99.999 | 0.10 ± 0.14 | 1.05 ± 0.07 | 99.999 | 0.16 ± 0.20 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 99.999 | 0.21 ± 0.15 | 1.10 ± 0.07 | 99.999 |
|
|
||||||||||||
vs. MBH |
−1.68 ± 0.11 | −0.92 ± 0.12 | 99.995 | −1.60 ± 0.12 | −1.10 ± 0.12 | 99.997 | −1.83 ± 0.10 | −1.04 ± 0.09 | 99.999 | −2.09 ± 0.10 | −1.03 ± 0.10 | 99.999 |
vs. accre |
−0.95 ± 0.17 | 1.19 ± 0.15 | 82.6 | −1.26 ± 0.16 | 1.09 ± 0.18 | 67.1 | −1.50 ± 0.13 | 1.11 ± 0.13 | 86.9 | −1.54 ± 0.13 | 1.11 ± 0.11 | 90.4 |
vs. accre |
... | ... | 45.8 | ... | ... | 63.3 | 4.38 ± 0.05 | −1.06 ± 0.03 | 81.6 | 4.22 ± 0.12 | −1.00 ± 0.07 | 86.2 |
|
|
||||||||||||
vs. LBol |
−1.49 ± 0.19 | −0.92 ± 0.18 | 99.69 | −1.37 ± 0.17 | −1.03 ± 0.13 | 99.93 | −1.44 ± 0.15 | −1.04 ± 0.12 | 99.95 | −1.66 ± 0.14 | −1.04 ± 0.13 | 99.96 |
vs. LBol |
... | ... | 63.1 | ... | ... | 61.2 | 4.37 ± 0.18 | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 85.2 | ... | ... | 64.7 |
|
|
||||||||||||
vs. Hβ |
−1.70 ± 0.14 | −2.87 ± 0.39 | 99.97 | −1.76 ± 0.12 | −3.25 ± 0.35 | 99.998 | −2.03 ± 0.10 | −3.01 ± 0.27 | 99.999 | −2.28 ± 0.11 | −2.38 ± 0.35 | 99.999 |
vs. Hβ |
... | ... | 37.0 | ... | ... | 36.3 | ... | ... | 60.3 | ... | ... | 34.3 |
|
|
||||||||||||
vs. Γ |
−1.98 ± 0.14 | 7.33 ± 1.31 | 98.5 | −2.15 ± 0.13 | 7.93 ± 1.90 | 99.94 | −2.44 ± 0.11 | 9.22 ± 1.20 | 99.992 | −2.54 ± 0.13 | 9.02 ± 1.38 | 99.97 |
vs. Γ |
... | ... | 27.9 | ... | ... | 53.3 | ... | ... | 64.3 | ... | ... | 44.2 |
Notes. For the correlations with significance higher than 65% we also report the best fit slope and normalisation as well as the associated 1-σ errors. We do not report the best fit values of the less significant correlations because of their loose physical meaning.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.




