Table 2
Distance of the known H II regions.
| Name | ℓ | b | CO velocity | Distance (B74) | Distance (C85) | Recent distance | Method | References |
| (°) | (°) | (km s-1) | (kpc) | (kpc) | (kpc) | see notes | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
|
|
||||||||
| BFS 52 | 191 90 |
+0 85 |
7.3 ± 0.5 | ··· | ··· | /![]() |
p∗ | 1/2 |
| SH 2-253 | 192 23 |
+3 59 |
14.4 ± 0.5 | ··· | ··· | 5.1 ± 1.5 | s | 3 |
| SH 2-254 | 192 49 |
–0 15 |
7.5 ± 0.7 | 1.12 ± 0.92 | 2.5 |
|
p† | 2 |
| SH 2-255 | 192 64 |
–0 01 |
7.5 ± 0.7 | 0.88 ± 0.80 | 2.5 |
|
p | 2 |
| SH 2-256 | 192 62 |
–0 13 |
7.5 ± 0.7 | ··· | 2.5 |
|
p† | 2 |
| SH 2-257 | 192 61 |
–0 07 |
7.5 ± 0.7 | 1.34 ± 0.95 | ··· |
|
p† | 2 |
| SH 2-258 | 192 73 |
+0 05 |
7.5 ± 0.7 | ··· | 2.5 |
|
p† | 2 |
| SH 2-259 | 192 94 |
–0 58 |
22.8 ± 0.5 | ··· | 8.3 | 8.9 ± 2.7 | s | 3 |
| SH 2-261 | 194 10 |
–1 90 |
··· | 0.90 ± 0.80 | 2.3/2.1 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | s | 3 |
| SH 2-266 | 195 66 |
–0 08 |
31.2 ± 1.1 | ··· | ··· | 2.0 ± 0.6 | s | 3 |
| SH 2-267 | 196 20 |
–1 20 |
··· | ··· | ··· | ~4.2 | s | 4 |
| SH 2-268 | 196 40 |
–2 80 |
4.8 ± 0.5 | ··· | ··· | 1.3 ± 0.4 | s | 3 |
| SH 2-269 | 196 40 |
–1 70 |
17.5 ± 0.7 | 1.88 ± 0.80 | ··· |
|
p | 5 |
| SH 2-270 | 196 84 |
–3 11 |
25.6 ± 0.4 | ··· | ··· | 6.8 ± 2.3 | k | 3 |
| SH 2-271 | 197 77 |
–2 31 |
20.5 ± 0.5 | ··· | ··· | 5.1 ± 1.1 | s | 3 |
| SH 2-272 | 197 81 |
–2 28 |
20.5 ± 0.5 | ··· | ··· | 5.1 ± 1.1 | s | 3 |
Notes. The source names are listed in Col. (1) and the central coordinates are in Cols. (2) and (3). The radial velocities of the peak CO emission associated with the H II regions are given in Col. (4). Columns (5) and (6) are the distances in Berkhuijsen (1974, B74) and Caswell (1985, C85). The distances taken from the recent literature are listed in Col. (7) with the distance measurement method given in Col. (8), and the references are given in Col. (9).p: parallax; p∗: associated with SH 2-252 or SH 2-254; p†: SH 2-254 to 258 are regarded to have the same distance; s: stellar distance; k: kinematic distance.
References. (1) Reid et al. (2009), (2) Rygl et al. (2010), (3) Russeil (2003), (4) Lahulla (1987), (5) Honma et al. (2007).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.



