Table 5
Model restitution of the chosen observational constraints plus quantities of interest.
| Model | T eff | L | [Fe/H] | log g | R | ⟨ Δν ⟩ | ν max | ⟨ r02 ⟩ | ⟨ rr01/10 ⟩ | X C | ΔY/ ΔZ | M cc | R zc | Mpsini |
| [K] | [L⊙] | [dex] | [dex] | [R⊙] | [μHz] | [μHz] | – | – | – | – | [M⋆] | [R⋆] | [MJupiter] | |
|
|
||||||||||||||
| A1 | 6116. | 2.053 | 0.22 | 4.29 | 1.28 | 101.33 | 2127. | 0.074 | 0.033 | 0.28 | 2.0 | 0.032 | 0.767 | 1.17 ± 0.03 |
| A2a | 6050. | 2.063 | 0.22 | 4.28 | 1.31 | 98.13 | 2061. | 0.081 | 0.034 | 0.33 | 2.0 | 0.024 | 0.798 | 1.18 ± 0.03 |
| A2b | 6053. | 2.063 | 0.22 | 4.28 | 1.31 | 98.14 | 2089. | 0.088 | 0.035 | 0.40 | 2.0 | 0.019 | 0.819 | 1.19 ± 0.03 |
| A2c | 6067. | 2.082 | 0.21 | 4.28 | 1.31 | 98.26 | 2083. | 0.086 | 0.034 | 0.38 | 2.0 | 0.021 | 0.813 | 1.19 ± 0.03 |
| A3 | 6024. | 2.066 | 0.22 | 4.28 | 1.32 | 98.15 | 2086. | 0.086 | 0.034 | 0.39 | 1.5 | 0.017 | 0.813 | 1.20 ± 0.03 |
| A4 | 6110. | 2.055 | 0.22 | 4.28 | 1.28 | 98.13 | 2035. | 0.084 | 0.035 | 0.33 | 3.3 | 0.035 | 0.809 | 1.14 ± 0.03 |
| A5 | 6116. | 2.053 | 0.22 | 4.32 | 1.28 | 104.16 | 2253. | 0.083 | 0.033 | 0.38 | 1.0 | 0.011 | 0.785 | 1.22 ± 0.05 |
| A6 | 6043. | 2.081 | 0.23 | 4.29 | 1.32 | 98.29 | 2095. | 0.083 | 0.034 | 0.37 | 1.5 | 0.021 | 0.801 | 1.20 ± 0.03 |
| A7 | 6020. | 2.102 | 0.23 | 4.29 | 1.34 | 98.29 | 2124. | 0.084 | 0.034 | 0.39 | 0.8 | 0.014 | 0.800 | 1.23 ± 0.03 |
Notes. Models listed here were optimized with the reference physics (set A, different cases, see Sect. 3 and Tables 2 and 3). As explained in the text, in cases 2b, 2c, 4, and 7 the optimization considers individual frequencies and separations that were corrected for near-surface effects while in cases 5 and 6 the optimization is based on un-corrected separation ratios r02 and rr01 /10. In case 1 no seismic constraints are considered. In cases 1, 5, and 6, we nevertheless chose to list below a corrected value of ⟨ Δν ⟩, i.e. a value corrected for surface effects a posteriori, after the optimized model was obtained. In cases 2a and 3, the scaling values of ⟨ Δν ⟩ are given, while in case 2c, we list Δνasym. Models without reference options are presented in the appendix.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.