Table 2
Comparison of different models.
ADAM | Dru08 | Dur11 | |||
|
|||||
λ (°) | 103 ± 4 | 118 ± 13 | 103 ± 5 | ||
β (°) | +22 ± 4 | +30 ± 13 | +27 ± 5 | ||
P (h) | 3091 ± 100 | – | 3100 ± 100 | ||
a (km) | 282 ± 5 | 298 ± 6 | 304 ± 29 | ||
b (km) | 249 ± 5 | 237 ± 4 | 286 ± 29 | ||
c (km) | 220 ± 5 | 222 ± 6 | 207 ± 29 | ||
D (km) | 249 ± 5 | 250 ± 9 | 252 ± 29 | ||
a/b | 1.13 ± 0.04 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | 1.06 ± 0.15 | ||
b/c | 1.13 ± 0.05 | 1.07 ± 0.03 | 1.39 ± 0.21 |
Notes. Spin (ECJ2000 longitude λ and latitude β) and dimensions (volume-equivalent diameter D and tri-axial ellipsoid diameters a, b, c along principal axes of inertia) of Juno derived with ADAM compared with the results from Drummond & Christou (2008) from tri-axial ellipsoid modeling of adaptive-optics images obtained at Lick 3-m Shane telescope and from Ďurech et al. (2011). The leading digits of the period P are 7.2095 and only the trailing digits are displayed in the table.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.