Fig. 5

A comparison of the various redshift methods used in this work. For the top plot, photometric versus spectroscopic, we have highlighted in red sources AzTEC/C61 and C8a which have ambiguous photometric redshifts. Source C61 also has a synthetic redshift, which we have plotted as an open red circle. The large negative error bar for the photometric redshift of AzTEC/C61 has been suppressed for clarity. In the bottom plot, FIR versus spectroscopic, we have noted AzTEC/C113 and AzTEC/C45 which, despite meeting our criteria for being part of the training set, proved to be significant outliers and were therefore ultimately ignored in our z versus λpeak fit. The dashed line in each panel indicates a 1:1 redshift match.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.