Free Access

Table 2

Comparison between position angle of magnetic field, CH3OH maser distribution, outflows, and linear polarization angles.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
Source Φf (a) χ(b) ⟨ΦB(b) PAoutflow ρ (c) |PAoutflow −⟨ΦB⟩| Ref.
(°) (°) (°) (°) (°) (°) (°) (°)
G30.70-0.07 (W43-MM2) 12 +61 ± 17 −45 ± 57(d) −63 ± 7 −0.65 56 ± 18(e)
G30.76-0.05 (W43-MM11) 12 +20 ± 64 +20 ± 64(d) −30 ± 48 −0.41 50 ± 80 -
G31.28+0.06 10 +53 ± 35 −38 ± 33(d) −26 ± 15(f,g) +73 ± 4 +0.39 12 ± 36 20 ± 35 81 ± 16(e) (1)
G32.03+0.06 12 −86 ± 79 −64 ± 34(d) +32 ± 7 +0.91 62 ± 79(e)
G69.52-0.97 6 −29 ± 5 −51 ± 69(d) −69 ± 15(h,g) +23 ± 7(i) +0.99 18 ± 71 52 ± 9 88 ± 17(e) (2)

From Paper IV(j)

G23.44-0.18 (MM2) 13 +23 ± 40 −67 ± 40 −40 ± 15 +30 ± 26 +0.69 27 ± 43 13 ± 48 70 ± 30 (3)
−24 ± 91 −0.37 47 ± 99 16 ± 92
G25.83-0.18 11 +23 ± 7 −67 ± 7 +10 ± 15 +51 ± 7 +0.69 77 ± 17 28 ± 10 41 ± 17 (3)
G25.71-0.04 23 −51 ± 77 −80 ± 43 −90 ± 15 −71 ± 9 −0.41 10 ± 46 20 ± 78 18 ± 18 (3)
G28.31-0.39 24 +40 ± 44 −50 ± 44 −52 ± 15 +85 ± 22 +0.07 2 ± 47 45 ± 49 84 ± 27 (3)
G28.83-0.25 10 −45 ± 34 +58 ± 59 −40 ± 15 −41 ± 10 -0.83 82 ± 61 4 ± 35 1 ± 18 (3)
G29.96-0.02 12 +62 ± 17 −29 ± 17 −38 ± 15 +80 ± 3 0.51 9 ± 23 18 ± 17 62 ± 16 (3)
G43.80-0.13 14 −81 ± 5 +9 ± 5 +38 ± 15 −48 ± 5 -0.94 29 ± 16 33 ± 7 86 ± 16 (3)
IRAS 20126+4104 4 −70 ± 16 +20 ± 16 −65 ± 5 +87 ± 4 +0.12 85 ± 17 23 ± 17 28 ± 6 (3)
G24.78+0.08-A2 17 −53 ± 2 +37 ± 2 −40 ± 15 −26 ± 19 −0.77 77 ± 15 79 ± 19 66 ± 24 (3)
G25.65+1.05 7 −80 ± 8 −23 ± 51 −15 ± 15 −49 ± 7 −0.87 8 ± 53 31 ± 11 64 ± 17 (3)
G29.86-0.04 17 +46 ± 41 +82 ± 56 +6 ± 15 +8 ± 7 +0.73 76 ± 58 38 ± 42 14 ± 17 (3)
G35.03+0.35 8 −64 ± 5 +26 ± 5 +27 ± 15 −26 ± 19 −0.77 1 ± 16 38 ± 20 53 ± 24 (3)
G37.43+1.51 4 +90 ± 3 +90 ± 3 −4 ± 15 −64 ± 5 −0.87 86 ± 15 26 ± 6 60 ± 16 (3)
G174.20-0.08 4 −40 ± 15 −63 ± 16 −0.45 23 ± 22 (3)
G213.70-12.6-IRS3 2 +20 ± 5 −70 ± 5 +53 ± 15 +63 ± 2 +0.95 57 ± 16 43 ± 5 10 ± 15 (3)
Cepheus A 2 −57 ± 28 +30 ± 19 +40 ± 4 −79 ± 9 −0.34 10 ± 19 22 ± 29 61 ± 10 (3)
W75N-group A 3 −13 ± 9 +77 ± 9 +66 ± 15 +43 ± 10 +0.96 11 ± 18 56 ± 14 23 ± 18 (3)
NGC7538-IRS1 6 −30 ± 69 +67 ± 70 −40 ± 10 +84 ± 7 +0.15 73 ± 71 66 ± 69 56 ± 12 (3)
W3(OH)-group II 4 +21 ± 45 −47 ± 44 −59 ± 6 −0.84 80 ± 45 (3)
W51-e2 12 + 33 ± 16 − 60 ± 21 − 50 ± 20 +57 ± 8 +0.70 10 ± 29 24 ± 18 73 ± 22 (3)
IRAS18556+0138 5 − 2 ± 11 + 88 ± 11 + 58 ± 23 −40 ± 2 −0.99 30 ± 26 42 ± 11 82 ± 23 (3)
W48 7 + 23 ± 7 − 67 ± 7 +55 ± 10 +0.70 78 ± 12 (3)
IRAS06058+2138-NIRS1 4 + 49 ± 47 − 49 ± 52 − 50 ± 15 +78 ± 7 +0.64 1 ± 54 29 ± 48 52 ± 17 (3)
IRAS22272+6358A 2 − 80 ± 15 + 9 ± 15 − 40 ± 15 −35 ± 11 −0.87 49 ± 21 45 ± 19 5 ± 19 (3)
S255-IR 4 + 36 ± 12 − 54 ± 12 + 75 ± 15 −63 ± 49 −0.11 51 ± 19 81 ± 51 42 ± 51 (3)
S231 4 + 28 ± 49 − 62 ± 49 − 47 ± 5 +28 ± 8 +0.97 15 ± 49 0 ± 50 75 ± 9 (3)
G291.27-0.70 7 − 32 ± 5 + 52 ± 5 −77 ± 14 45 ± 15 (3)
G305.21+0.21 9 − 51 ± 14 28 ± 14 +48 ± 23 81 ± 27 (3)
G309.92+0.47 12 + 2 ± 56 − 75 ± 56 +35 ± 5 33 ± 56 (3)
G316.64-0.08 3 − 67 ± 36 + 21 ± 36 +34 ± 29 79 ± 46 (3)
G335.79+0.17 8 + 44 ± 28 − 41 ± 28 −69 ± 25 67 ± 38 (3)
G339.88-1.26 7 + 77 ± 24 − 12 ± 24 −60 ± 17 43 ± 29 (3)
G345.01+1.79 5 + 5 ± 39 − 86 ± 39 +74 ± 4 69 ± 39 (3)
NGC6334F (central) 5 + 77 ± 20 − 13 ± 20 + 30 ± 15 −41 ± 16 43 ± 25 62 ± 26 71 ± 41 (3)
NGC6334F (NW) 5 − 71 ± 20 + 19 ± 20 + 30 ± 15 −80 ± 38 11 ± 25 9 ± 43 70 ± 41 (3)

Notes. (a)Foreground Faraday rotation. It was estimated by using Eq. (3) of Paper I. (b)Because of the high uncertainties of the estimated Φf, the angles are not corrected for Φf. (c) Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient −1 ≤ ρ ≤ +1; ρ = + 1 (ρ = − 1) is total positive (negative) correlation, ρ = 0 is no correlation. (d)Before averaging, we use the criterion described in Sect. 3 to estimate the orientation of the magnetic field w.r.t the linear polarization vectors. (e)The differences between the angles are evaluated taking into account that PAPA ± 180°, ⟨χ⟩ ≡ ⟨χ⟩± 180°, and ⟨ΦB ⟩ ≡⟨ΦB⟩± 180°. (f)Redshifted lobe of the outflow. (g)We consider an arbitrary conservativeerror of 15°. (h)We consider the CO outflow. (i)We consider clusters I and II. (j)Here we omit all the notes that are already indicated in Table 4 of Paper IV.

References. (1) Yang et al. (2018); (2) Kumar et al. (2004); (3) Paper IV and references therein.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.