Open Access

Table 1.

Data from the literature for the twelve stellar associations with LDB ages.

Stellar LDB Ref. Gaia Collaboration (2018b)
[Fe/H] Other Ref.
association age Age Ref. Parallaxes DM d E(B − V) Ref. age
[Ma] [Ma] [mas] [mag] [pc] [mag] [dex] [Ma]
Alpha Persei 90 ± 10 (8) (23) 5.718 ± 0.005 6.214 175 0.090 (23) +0.14 ± 0.11 (29)
85 ± 10 (7)

NGC 1960 22 ± 4 (1) 25 (22) 0.835 ± 0.064 10.391 1197 0.20 (26) < 22.4 (29)

IC 4665 28 ± 4 (2) (22) 2.891 ± 0.003 7.694 346 0.17 (27) −0.03 ± 0.08 (29)
(3)

NGC 2547 35 ± 1 (4) (23) 2.543 ± 0.002 7.980 394 0.040 (23) −0.01 ± 0.01 57 ± 5.7 (30)
(3)

IC 2602 (5) (23) 6.571 ± 0.007 5.914 152 0.031 (23) −0.02 ± 0.02 (29)
(3)

53 ± 5 (6)
IC 2391 50 ± 5 (7) (23) 6.597 ± 0.007 5.908 152 0.030 (23) −0.01 ± 0.03 (29)
(3)

125 ± 8 (9)
The Pleiades 130 ± 20 (7) (23) 7.364 ± 0.005 5.667 136 0.045 (23) −0.01 ± 0.05 (29)
112 ± 5 (10)

Blanco 1 132 ± 24 (11) (23) 4.216 ± 0.003 6.876 237 0.010 (23) +0.03 ± 0.07 90 ± 25 (31)
(12) (23)

The Hyades 650 ± 70 (13) (23) 21.052 ± 0.065 3.389 48 0.001 (23) +0.13 ± 0.05 661−215 (29)
678 ± 98 (14)

< 20 (15)
21 ± 4 (16)
BPMG 26 ± 3 (17) 12–22 (24) 9–73 −0.01 ± 0.08 20 ± 10 (32)
25 ± 3 (18)
22 ± 6 (19)

THMG 40 ± 3 (20) 10–40 (24) 36–71 −0.03 ± 0.05 30 (33)

32 Ori MG 23 ± 4 (21) (25) 70–110 0.03 ± 0.01 (28) 25.0 ± 2.5 (34)

Notes. The “Parallaxes” and “DM” values comes from Gaia Collaboration (2018b) with the exception of NGC 1960 that comes from Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018a). The “d” values come from Gaia Collaboration (2018b) with the exception of BPMG and THMG (Malo et al. 2013); and 32 Ori MG (Bell et al. 2017). We took the “[Fe/H]“ values from Netopil et al. (2016), with the exception of NGC 2547 (Randich et al. 2018), and BPMG and THMG (Viana Almeida et al. 2009). We assumed solar abundances for NGC 1960 and the 32 Ori MG because lack metallicity values in the literature. Mermilliod (1981) does not provide age errors, so we estimated them from the log t.

References. (1) Jeffries et al. (2013); (2) Manzi et al. (2008); (3) Randich et al. (2018); (4) Jeffries & Oliveira (2005); (5) Dobbie et al. (2010); (6) Barrado y Navascués et al. (1999a); (7) Barrado y Navascués et al. (2004); (8) Stauffer et al. (1999); (9) Stauffer et al. (1998b); (10) Dahm (2015); (11) Cargile et al. (2010); (12) Juarez et al. (2014)); (13) Martín et al. (2018); (14) Lodieu et al. (2018); (15) Song et al. (2002)); (16) Binks & Jeffries (2014); (17) Malo et al. (2014b)); (18) Messina et al. (2016); (19) Shkolnik et al. (2017); (20) Kraus et al. (2014)); (21) Bell et al. (2017); (22) Bossini et al. (2019); (23) Gaia Collaboration (2018b); (24) Malo et al. (2013)); (25) Bell et al. (2015); (26) Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018a); (27) Cargile & James (2010); (28) Bell et al. (2017); (29) Mermilliod (1981); (30) Claria (1982); (31) Panagi & O’dell (1997); (32) Barrado y Navascués et al. (1999b); (33) Torres et al. (2008); (34) Mamajek (2007).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.