Fig. 10.
Download original image
L[CII]/LIR ratio as a function of LIR for local and high-redshift sources. Local (z < 1) sources are taken from Díaz-Santos et al. (2013). High-redshift sources are from De Looze et al. (2014) and Gullberg et al. (2015). Literature results for high-redshift quasars and companion sources are taken from Decarli et al. (2017) and Neeleman et al. (2019, for these we take an average of the reported LIR). We note that we only consider the L[CII]/LIR as an upper limit for all companion sources. The error bar we used for BRI0952 comes from the uncertainty on the lensing factor on LIR. The error bar on the LIR and hence L[CII]/LIR ratio of AzTEC-3 is taken to be the range of LIR values provided by Capak et al. (2011). For data points taken from other papers, we assumed LFIR ∼ 0.75 × LIR (following Decarli et al. 2017), but added an additional indicative error bar to the bottom left of the plot indicating the conservative estimate ∼30% due to this assumption (Carilli & Walter 2013).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.