Open Access
Table 1.
Best-fit parameters of the geometric models in the L band.
| Ring models | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object |  |
Rin | θ | i | PA | p | fbg0 | fstar0 | dbg | dring |
| (mas) | (mas) | (deg) | (deg) | (%) | (%) | |||||
| HD 101584 | 0.7 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 23 ± 17 | 18 ± 21 | −3.0 ± 0.3 | 11 ± 9 | 2 | 34.1 ± 10.0 | 24.9 ± 6.8 |
| HD 108015 ( * ) | 9.0 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 8.1 ± 1.7 | 35 ± 11 | 45 ± 13 | −1.4 | 5 ± 1 | 10 | −15.4 ± 3.7 | 4.2 ± 3.8 |
| IRAS 08544 | 23 | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 7.9 ± 0.9 | 16 ± 5 | 116 ± 25 | −1.6 | 37 ± 1 | 6 | 2.8 ± 1.4 | −0.8 ± 0.8 |
| IRAS 15469 | 1.0 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 14.8 ± 2.3 | 47 ± 5 | 50 ± 4 | −2.1 | 11 ± 3 | 6 | −1.1 ± 5.3 | −1.5 ± 5.8 |
| IW Car ( * ) | 29 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 18.2 ± 1.1 | 50 ± 3 | 172 ± 2 | −1.1 ± 0.1 | 11 ± 1 | 2 | 34.2 ± 5.4 | 34.9 ± 5.3 |
| CT Ori ( * ) | 1.5 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 1.0 | 40 ± 4 | 172 ± 5 | −1.5 ± 0.3 | 20 ± 3 | 29 | 2.9 ± 1.8 | −0.4 ± 1.8 |
| AD Aql | 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 1.3 | 39 | 48 ± 19 | −2 | 27 ± 11 | 37 | 8.3 ± 2.1 | 12.5 ± 3.7 |
| RU Cen | 1.6 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 68 ± 8 | 154 ± 5 | −2 | 9 ± 2 | 78 | 9.2 ± 1.6 | −6.3 ± 3.1 |
| ST Pup | 15 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 9.8 | 50 | 128 | −1.6 | 30 ± 5 | 61 | 6.2 ± 1.0 | 15 ± 12 |
| Binary models | ||||||||||
| Object |  |
fbg0 | fstar | fstar2 | dbg | xstar2 | ystar2 | |||
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (mas) | (mas) | ||||||
| EP Lyr | 2.3 | 18 ± 17 | 65 ± 12 | 17 ± 14 | 2.3 ± 2.1 | −0.1 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | |||
Notes. Reported values are calculated at λ0 = 3.5 μm. ( * )The model included azimuthal modulations.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.