Table 3.
Relative difference of the 95% confidence levels with respect to Camarena et al. (2023), for the optimistic case in our analysis, in which we fixed our nuisance parameters, as is described in Sect. 4.1.
Base.+DESI +eROSITA opt. | |
---|---|
δ0 | −3.1% |
zB | 36.3% |
h | 55.4% |
As | 53.3% |
Ωm, 0 | 64.0% |
Notes. To be on an equal footing with that work, we show the relative difference in terms of the amplitude of the primordial power spectrum of scalar perturbations, As, because the aforementioned work did not output constraints for σ8. A positive value indicates a gain, while the negative sign indicates a loss.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.