Table 2.
LyC leaker candidates, various measurements of fesc.
| ID | z |
|
TIGM | AV | Method |
|
fesc, rel[%] |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold candidates | |||||||||
| 1181371 | 3.08 | 1.17 ± 0.22 | 0.66 | 0.42 ± 0.11 | fixed | 3 | 350 ± 66 | 530 ± 100 | 360 ± 77 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 102 ± 19 | 155 ± 28 | 105 ± 22 | |||||
| CIGALE | 1.36 | 88±7 (90 ± 6) | |||||||
| 3052076 | 3.46 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.46 | 0.78 ± 0.01 | fixed | 3 | 30 ± 6 | 66 ± 13 | 32 ± 6 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 17 ± 3 | 37 ± 7 | 18 ± 3 | |||||
| CIGALE | 4.32 | 23±5 (40 ± 0) | |||||||
| 109004028 | 3.27 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.57 | 0.58 ± 0.13 | fixed | 3 | 43 ± 12 | 76 ± 21 | 45 ± 14 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 13 ± 4 | 23 ± 7 | 13 ± 4 | |||||
| CIGALE | 4.64 | 34±10 (47 ± 6) | |||||||
| 122021111 | 3.79 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.03 ± 0.04 | fixed | 3 | 19 ± 4 | 64 ± 13 | 62 ± 13 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 12 ± 3 | 40 ± 10 | 39 ± 10 | |||||
| CIGALE | 3.98 | 66±11 (77 ± 12) | |||||||
| 126049137 | 4.43 | 0.27 ± 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.24 | fixed | 3 | 81 ± 37 | 1473 ± 673 | 649 ± 329 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 49 ± 22 | 891 ± 400 | 393 ± 196 | |||||
| CIGALE | 1.39 | 69±10 (76 ± 9) | |||||||
| Silver candidates | |||||||||
| 1521589 | 3.15 | 0.37 ± 0.11 | 0.61 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | fixed | 3 | 110 ± 34 | 180 ± 56 | 164 ± 52 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 26 ± 8 | 42 ± 13 | 39 ± 12 | |||||
| CIGALE | 1.55 | 79±15 (86 ± 10) | |||||||
| 3452147 | 3.52 | 0.48 ± 0.15 | 0.46 | 0.70 ± 0.18 | fixed | 3 | 143 ± 46 | 314 ± 101 | 165 ± 60 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 69 ± 22 | 152 ± 48 | 80 ± 28 | |||||
| CIGALE | 2.70 | 47±14 (56 ± 14) | |||||||
| 4062373 | 3.66 | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.92 ± 0.11 | fixed | 3 | 106 ± 40 | 301 ± 113 | 129 ± 50 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 61 ± 23 | 173 ± 65 | 74 ± 28 | |||||
| CIGALE | 4.93 | 74±13 (82 ± 13) | |||||||
| 4172404 | 3.67 | 0.52 ± 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.49 ± 0.22 | fixed | 3 | 156 ± 45 | 443 ± 128 | 282 ± 100 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 94 ± 27 | 267 ± 77 | 170 ± 60 | |||||
| CIGALE | 1.75 | 31±15 (47 ± 15) | |||||||
| 5622786 | 4.00 | 0.36 ± 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | fixed | 3 | 108 ± 44 | 555 ± 225 | 555 ± 225 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 62 ± 25 | 319 ± 128 | 319 ± 128 | |||||
| CIGALE | 3.86 | 53±11 (71 ± 10) | |||||||
| 119004004 | 3.31 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 0.57 | 0.81 ± 0.26 | fixed | 3 | 54 ± 19 | 96 ± 34 | 45 ± 19 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 28 ± 10 | 51 ± 18 | 24 ± 10 | |||||
| CIGALE | 2.81 | 26±14 (50 ± 14) | |||||||
| 122032127 | 4.35 | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.28 | fixed | 3 | 52 ± 19 | 674 ± 246 | 445 ± 199 |
| BPASS | 1.72 | 23 ± 9 | 298 ± 117 | 197 ± 92 | |||||
| CIGALE | 1.25 | 77±14 (84 ± 12) | |||||||
Notes. Overview of different escape fraction values based on three different methods. (fLyC/fUV)obs: observed flux ratio between the LyC band WFC3/UVIS F336W and the UV continuum in ACS F775W, given in frequency space. TIGM: LyC transmission in the IGM at the redshift of the object, using the mean of the 5% lines of sight with the highest transmission. AV: dust extinction from the SED fit of CIGALE. (L1500/L900)int: intrinsic luminosity ratio between the UV continuum at 1500 Å and the LyC at 900 Å. The three different methods (in the method column) correspond to a fixed value of 3, which is often used in the literature, a value of 1.72 based on a BPASS model with a young age of 3 Myr and a metallicity of Z = 0.002, and the third value is the ratio measured from the SED model of CIGALE, using the stellar unattenuated model without IGM absorption. fesc, rel: relative escape fraction for two different methods. The first corresponds to the intrinsic flux ratio of 3 and uses the fluxes directly measured from the respective bands (the third column in this table). The second escape fraction is based on the BPASS model and uses flux measurements that are corrected to the wavelengths 1500 Å and 900 Å using the model. There is no relative escape fraction without IGM absorption from the SED fits using CIGALE.
: relative escape fractions taking into account the IGM absorption shown in the fourth column of this table. The three escape fractions correspond again to the different methods, with the third one being the sightline-dependent escape fraction measured by CIGALE.
: absolute escape fractions taking the dust extinction AV (fifth column of this table) into account, again for the three different methods. Note that since CIGALE takes the dust attenuation in the UVC already into account, we directly get the absolute escape fraction. The value in brackets denotes the absolute escape fraction from CIGALE when the dust description is extended below 912 Å but only at a 10% level.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.