Open Access

Table 7

Literature versus Shallot Explorer model comparisons.

J1407 b Kenworthy & Mamajek (2015) Shallot
Rdisc [AU] 0.60 0.52
i [o] 70 78
ϕ [o] 166 175
δx [AU] 0.092 0.028
δy [AU] 0.075 0.019

PDS 110 Osborn et al. (2017) Shallot

Rdisc [AU] 0.67 0.22
i [o] 75 82
ϕ [o] 159 175
δx [AU] 0.063 0.028
δy [AU] 0.038 0.019

Notes. The value listed under Shallot is the smallest disc solution with a rms¯<0.2$\overline {{\rm{rms}}} &gt; 0.2$.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.