LiBeB and CNO nuclei. Top left panel: C flux compared to the data of AMS02 (Aguilar et al. 2021d, black dots), CALET (Adriani et al. 2020, blue squares), CREAM (Ahn et al. 2009, magenta diamonds), and NUCLEON (Grebenyuk et al. 2019a, green triangles). Center left panel: N flux compared to the data of AMS02 (Aguilar et al. 2021d, black dots), CREAM (Ahn et al. 2009, magenta diamonds). Bottom left panel: O flux compared to the data of AMS02 (Aguilar et al. 2021d, 2023, black dots and yellow diamonds), CALET (Adriani et al. 2020, blue squares), CREAM (Ahn et al. 2009, magenta diamonds), and NUCLEON (Grebenyuk et al. 2019a, green triangles). The solid red line corresponds to the total modulated flux, while the solid blue line to the (modulated) secondary contribution to the given nucleus. The cyan (blue) shaded region corresponds to a 10% (20%) uncertainty in the secondary production cross section, which translates in the yellow (green) shaded region in the total flux. Right panels: Li, Be, and B fluxes compared to the data of AMS02 (Aguilar et al. 2021d, black dots) and CALET (Adriani et al. 2020, blue squares). The solid red line corresponds to the total modulated flux. The yellow (green) shaded region corresponds to a 10% (20%) uncertainty in the secondary production cross section. The solid blue line corresponds to the total flux multiplied by f_Li = 0.92 (Li), f_Be = 0.9 (Be) and f_B = 1.1 (B).