Estimates of enclosed mass of Milky Way at different radii together with our constraints with the (blue) star symbol at 100 kpc. As in the diagram in Bobylev & Baykova (2023), which we adapted here, with the exceptions of 32 and 33 which are new estimates by Ibata et al. (2024) and are highlighted here, the annotated numbers for each data point correspond to 1–Küpper et al. (2015), 2–Malhan & Ibata (2019), 3–Prudil et al. (2022), 4–Posti & Helmi (2019), 5–Williams et al. (2017), 6–Ablimit & Zhao (2017), 7–Williams & Evans (2015), 8–Xue et al. (2008), 9–Gnedin et al. (2010), 10–Gibbons et al. (2014), 11–Vasiliev et al. (2021), 12–Shen et al. (2022), 13–Correa Magnus & Vasiliev (2022), 14–Eadie & Juric´ (2019), 15–McMillan (2017), 16– Vasiliev (2019b), 17–Battaglia et al. (2005), 18–Eadie et al. (2017), 19–Eadie & Harris (2016), 20–Deason et al. (2012), 21–Ablimit et al. (2020), 22–Bird et al. (2022) (from data of K-type giants), 23–Zhou et al. (2023), 24–Bhattacharjee et al. (2014), 25–Wang et al. (2022), 26–Bird et al. (2022) (from data of BHB stars), 27–Sun et al. (2023), 28–Bajkova & Bobylev (2016), 29–Huang et al. (2016), 30–Eadie et al. (2015), 31–Patel et al. (2018), 32–Ibata et al. (2024) (within 50 kpc), and 33–Ibata et al. (2024) (estimate of virial mass within 200 kpc).