Open Access

Fig. I.2

image

Download original image

Corner plot of the first eclipse with the pixel-fitting method. Many parameters appear independent but we still find the eclipse depth is correlated with the detector settling parameters hramp and lramp, similar to Figure I.1. In addition, when the shared height scale of independent pixel systematics hIPS;shared is high, the height scale of flux-conserving systematics hFCS is reduced. This makes sense as the "bumps" seen in each pixel light curve in Figure 1 could in principle be fit as either flux-conserved systematics or independent systematics, but the model does clearly prefer to fit a non-zero flux-conserving systematics height scale hFCS while hIPS;shared is consistent with zero. This means the model favours that these "bumps" are flux-conserving and not independent.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.