Hot Rocks Survey - III. A deep eclipse for LHS 1140c and a new Gaussian process method to account for correlated noise in individual pixels

Open Access

Table 5

Comparison of individual eclipse depths using aperture extraction from the primary reduction analysis.

Model	t_cut	E1	E2	E3	Comb.
`L`	30	499±53	287±51	313±52	364±30
	45	446±53	273±52	316±52	344±30
	60	412±56	248±53	309±55	320±32
`L+E`	30	305±71	235±65	291±61	276±38
	45	327±76	211±66	278±71	267±41
	60	324±76	228±76	244±80	266±45
`L+GP`	30	389±126	284±64	312±60	309±41
	45	421±85	272±62	313±59	319±38
	60	404±70	249±60	307±62	312±37
`L+E+GP`	30	306±79	244±75	288±69	279±43
	45	327±82	215±75	272±79	268±45
	60	321±85	226±80	243±88	262±49

Notes. Each model included some combination of a linear slope (L), exponential ramp (E) and/or a GP. Initial time cut is denoted in minutes.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.