Hot Jupiter inflated radii observational trends for the 424 Jupiter-like exoplanets in the database with available estimated mass M ≥ 0.5 M_j; age t ≥ 100 Myr; radius, R; and equilibrium temperature, T_eq. We consider only the planets with relative errors in a radius of less than 25% and available uncertainties for the mass. We also excluded seven planets younger than 100 Myr. Top: [lanetary radius, R, versus, T_eq, or, equivalently, irradiated flux $F_{\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{r}}=4{\sigma }_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{b}}{T}_{\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}}^4$. The colour of the data points identify the mass by ranges as follows: purple [0.5,0.8) M_j, dark blue [0.8,1.5) M_j, blue [1.5,2.5) M_j, green [2.5,4) M_j, yellow [4,8) M_j and orange [8,13] M_j . With the same colour coding, the lines represent the best-fit reported in Table 1, for the planets within each mass range, and considering only T_eq > 1000 K. For the sake of better visibility of the bulk of planets, we left out three ultra-HJ with T_eq > 3300 K from the plot, but they are considered in the statistical trends. The grey background boxes indicate the mean and standard deviation of the observed radius R ± δ_R for all HJs within a 250 K-wide range of T_eq. Bottom: histograms of the observed radii for the same T_eq ranges per each T_eq range of the grey boxes of the top panel. Due to the small size of the hottest HJ sample, we grouped two T_eq bins in the last histogram.