Notes. From top to bottom, the time-delay TDCOSMO-2025 lenses, the SLACS sample, and the SL2S sample are separated by horizontal dividers. From left to right, the listed quantities are: deflector redshift z_lens, background source redshift z_source, stellar velocity dispersion measured within an aperture σ_los^ap, half-light radius R_eff, Einstein radius θ_E, lensing power-law slope γ_pl, observed axis ratio of light profile of the deflector q_light, and lensing information ℐ calculated by Sheu et al. (2025). The uncertainties in the stellar velocity dispersions σ_los^ap include both statistical and systematic uncertainties, summed in quadrature. For the lenses with IFU kinematic data (RX J1131−1231 and the quality SLACS sample), we list the deflector’s stellar velocity dispersion σ_los^ap measured within apertures with radii equal to half the effective radii (Table 2 in Knabel et al. 2025a) for comparison with lenses with aperture stellar velocity dispersions. The stellar velocity dispersion σ_los^ap for the SL2S sample is taken from Mozumdar et al. (2025). For the half-light radius R_eff, we estimated the uncertainty to be 5% in the inference. For the Einstein radius θ_E, we estimated the uncertainty to be 2%. For lenses with aperture kinematic data, the uncertainty for the lensing power-law slope γ_pl was marginalized over in the inference. For the SLACS lenses with velocity dispersion profiles from spatially resolved data, the power-law slope inference is driven by the kinematic data.