Open Access

Table B.2

Comparison of existing GI population syntheses.

Publication Forgan & Rice (2013) Müller et al. (2018) Nayakshin (2015a) Nayakshin (2015b) Nayakshin & Fletcher (2015) Nayakshin (2016) Humphries et al. (2019)
Title Towards a population synthesis model of objects formed by self-gravitating disc fragmentation and tidal downsizing On the Diversity in Mass and Orbital Radius of Giant Planets Formed via Disk Instability Tidal Downsizing model -1. Numerical methods: saving giant planets from tidal disruptions Tidal Downsizing model. II. Planet- metallicity correlations Tidal downsizing model - III. planets from subearths to brown dwarfs: Structure and metallicity preferences Tidal Downsizing model - IV. Destructive feedback in planets Constraining the initial planetary population in the gravitational instability model

Viscous a 0.005 0.005 0.01 [0.001..0.01] 0.005 [O.OO5..O.O5] 0.005
Glɑ Gammie (2001) Kratter et al. (2008) 0.2Q02Q02+Q2$0.2{{Q_0^2} \over {Q_0^2 + {Q^2}}}$ 0.2Q02Q02+Q2$0.2{{Q_0^2} \over {Q_0^2 + {Q^2}}}$ 0.2Q02Q02+Q2$0.2{{Q_0^2} \over {Q_0^2 + {Q^2}}}$ 0.12
Type Imig tI.FR Baruteau et al. (2011) tI,N×(1+MdMp)${t_{{\rm{I,N}}}} \times \left( {1 + _{{M_{\rm{d}}}}^{{M_{\rm{p}}}}} \right)$ [1..10] × tI,N [0.5..2] × tI,n [1..4] × tI,N 0.8 × tI,n
Type II mig tII,FR viscous1 impulse approx. impulse approx. impulse approx. impulse approx. tIL,FR×(1+MdMp)${t_{{\rm{IL,FR}}}} \times \left( {1 + _{{M_{\rm{d}}}}^{{M_{\rm{p}}}}} \right)$
Gap opening Armitage & Bonnell (2002)0 various1 Crida et al. (2006) Crida et al. (2006) Crida et al. (2006) Crida et al. (2006) Crida et al. (2006)2
Gas accretion Galvani & Mayer (2014)
Pebble accretion
# fragments several3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Condition for frag. Forgan & Rice (2011) 4 5 5 5 5 5
2nd collapse
Initial fragment location randomly in unstable region [80..120] au 100au [60..120] au [70..105] au [70..105] au [40..300] au
Tidal downsizing
Thermal bath disruption
Initial stellar mass [0.8..1.2] M 0.6, 1.0, 1.4, 2.4 msun 1 M 1 M 1 M 1 M 1 M
Initial disc mass [0.125..0.375] M 0.18, 0.3, 0.42, 0.72 M 0.12 M [0.05..0.2] M [0.075..0.15] M [0.075..0.2]M [0.1..0.3] M
Initial q = Md/M* constant 0.3 0.12 0.05-0.2 0.075-0.15 0.075-0.2 0.1-0.3
Initial disc radius [50..100] au ≈ 120 au 120au 100 au 100 au 100 au 80-300 au
Initial surface density profile —1 —1/2,-1.-3/2 —1 —1 —1 —1 —1
Photoevaoration Owen et al. (2010) UV and X-ray6 6 and7 6 and7
Initial fragment mass Forgan & Rice (2011) 0.5 M to 16M, 1 M or 5 M 0.5, 0.7, 1 or 2 M [0.333.,16] M [0.333..8] M, 1.3. 5.7 M
Clump structure FC8 varied FC8 FC8 FC8 FC8 Vazan & Helled (2012)
Clump contraction
Grain growth
Grain sedimentation
Core formation and growth
N-body interaction —/(✓)9

Notes. If ranges are given in brackets, it means the corresponding values are sampled in a Monte Carlo approach from the given interval. The updated Forgan & Rice mode. ’Towards a population synthesi‘s model of self-gravitating disc fragmentation and tidal downsizing II: the effect of fragment-fragment interactions’, is not included in a separate row. However, the differences are explained. See text for further explanations.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.