Table 2
Disk fractions from this work and the literature in various regions.
| References | Disk fraction (%) | SpT range | Mass rangea (MJup) | Region | Ageb (Myr) | Nobjects d | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This work | 37.5 ± 6.2 | – | 6–11.8 | Upper Sco | 5 | 32 | W1–W2 vs Mass |
![]() |
– | 11.8–16.8 | 5 | 32 | |||
| 34.2 ± 0.0 | – | 16.8–25 | 5 | 38 | |||
![]() |
– | 8–13.7 | 10 | 24 | |||
![]() |
– | 13.7–15.5 | 10 | 27 | |||
| 32.1 ± 3.6 | – | 15.5–25 | 10 | 28 | |||
| Luhman & Esplin (2020) | ![]() |
M8–L2 | 10.5–36.7 | Upper Sco | 10 | 27/115 | Ks –I2/W2 vs SpT |
| Luhman (2025) | 26 | M6.25–M9.5 | 14.8–97.8 | Upper Sco | 10 | 52/200 | W1–W2 vs SpT |
| Luhman et al. (2016) | 52 ± 10 | M8–L0 | 10.6–23 | NGC 1333 | 3 | 11/21 | Literature (Spitzer) |
| Scholz et al. (2023) | ![]() |
M9–L3 | 5.9–12.0 | NGC 1333 | 2 | 5/12 | K–I2 vs SpT |
| Esplin & Luhman (2019) | ![]() |
M8–L0 | 14.2–23.7 | Taurus | 3 | 15/37 | Ks –I2/W2 vs SpT |
| Damian et al. (2023) | 80 ± 55 c | – | 10.5–32.5 | σ Orionis | 2–3 | 5/6 | Ks–W2 slope |
| Luhman et al. (2016) | ![]() |
M8–L0 | 10.6–23 | IC 348 | 3 | 10/24 | Literature (Spitzer) |
| Seo & Scholz (2025) | ![]() |
M9–L1 | 9.3–13.2 | IC 348 | 3 | 6/13 | K–IRAC2 vs SpT + SED modeling |
Notes. a Mass range when not explicitly given in the referenced study, inferred using the Faherty et al. (2016) temperature scale for young brown dwarfs and the evolutionary models of Saumon & Marley (2008), based on the spectral type and the ageb of the region. b Age of the region as adopted by the authors. Note that these values may differ across studies and may have been revised in light of recent constraints, particularly following the release of Gaia data (e.g., Gaia DR2 and DR3; Gaia Collaboration 2018, 2021). c Not shown in Fig. 7 to preserve clarity due to its extreme value and ill-defined error. d Number of objects in each mass bin for this study. Fractions expressed as Ndisk/Ntot represent those found in the literature values, as reported by the authors. Fields marked with “–” indicate values not specified by the authors.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.







