Combined α-, light-, odd-Z, and s-process elements from our BACCHUS results listed in Table 4. Notably, we used mean values for common elements in the H and K band. Panels a–p: [C/Fe]–[N/Fe], [C/Fe]–[O/Fe], [N/Fe]–[O/Fe], [C/Fe]–[N/Al], [Mg/Fe]–[Al/Fe], [Si/Fe]–[Al/Fe], [N/Fe]–[Mg/Fe], [Mg/Fe]–[Si/Fe], [N/Fe]–[Si/Fe], [O/Fe]–[Mg/Fe], [N/Fe]–[Ce/Fe], [Al/Fe]–[Ce/Fe], [O/Fe]–[Na/Fe], [Fe/H]–[Mg/Fe], [Fe/H]– [Si/Fe], and [Al/Fe]–[Mg/Mn] distributions for Patchick 126 (cyan circles). We compare our results with other APOGEE-2 GCs examined by Mészáros et al. (2020): NGC 6388 (open blue diamonds), NGC 6441 (open black squares), NGC 6838 (M71; open violet pentagons), and NGC 6553 (open orange triangles). The error bars mark the typical uncertainty (σ_tot) listed in Table 4. The dashed black lines in Panel p define the criterion to separate in situ from accreted populations, similar to that defined by Horta et al. (2021), Fernández-Trincado et al. (2022a), Souza et al. (2023).