Open Access

Table 3.

Model comparison statistics for candidate spot occultations.

Transit ΔL1, 0 B1, 0 tc θmin c Tspot
(BJD-2450000) (deg) (–) (K)
116 17.99 2.36 5877.01 2 . 1 1.5 + 3.4 Mathematical equation: $ 2.1_{-1.5}^{+3.4} $ 0 . 32 0.02 + 0.04 Mathematical equation: $ 0.32_{-0.02}^{+0.04} $ 4471 53 + 26 Mathematical equation: $ 4471_{-53}^{+26} $
117 21.66 9.00 5884.85 15 . 1 4.6 + 4.9 Mathematical equation: $ 15.1_{-4.6}^{+4.9} $ 0 . 20 0.03 + 0.03 Mathematical equation: $ 0.20_{-0.03}^{+0.03} $ 4621 36 + 35 Mathematical equation: $ 4621_{-36}^{+35} $
121 20.06 7.51 5916.18 2 . 9 1.7 + 3.4 Mathematical equation: $ 2.9_{-1.7}^{+3.4} $ 0 . 32 0.02 + 0.03 Mathematical equation: $ 0.32_{-0.02}^{+0.03} $ 4471 40 + 26 Mathematical equation: $ 4471_{-40}^{+26} $

Notes. Statistics are presented in terms of logarithms of likelihood ratios ΔL1, 0 and logarithms of Bayes factors B1, 0 in favour of model with one spot occultation ℳ1 and against a model without them ℳ0. The parameters reported here for each spot are the time of transit centre tc, the minimal angular diameter θmin, spot contrast c, and temperature Tspot.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.